All my ratings decreased by 700 points.
WOW! This is sooo good!

it's a bug.
ye
Either that or chess.com is trying to give us heart attacks; they know we chess players care too much about our ratings!

They just want to show FIDE rating.
My FIDE strength is still above 1300 lol
bruh I dont think so, ur FIDE strength according to my assessment is 1200. No hard feelings tho, U will get better

They just want to show FIDE rating.
My FIDE strength is still above 1300 lol
bruh I dont think so, ur FIDE strength according to my assessment is 1200. No hard feelings tho, U will get better
FIDE strength = 90+30 strength and other classical time controls I know my blitz strength is bad, but do I even care?

They just want to show FIDE rating.
My FIDE strength is still above 1300 lol
bruh I dont think so, ur FIDE strength according to my assessment is 1200. No hard feelings tho, U will get better
FIDE strength = 90+30 strength, I know my 3+0 strength is bad,but do I even care?
I mean, even I can assume that I am CM strength. But deep down ik that my strength is like 1800 FIDE only

They just want to show FIDE rating.
My FIDE strength is still above 1300 lol
bruh I dont think so, ur FIDE strength according to my assessment is 1200. No hard feelings tho, U will get better
FIDE strength = 90+30 strength, I know my 3+0 strength is bad,but do I even care?
I mean, even I can assume that I am CM strength. But deep down ik that my strength is like 1800 FIDE only
ok, whatever u think, idk ur classical, but like even when i was 1300 online i used to beat 1100 fide people in classical OTB, so my strength is ATLEAST 1300 right now thats what I can say.

I mean, even I can assume that I am CM strength. But deep down ik that my strength is like 1800 FIDE only
ok, whatever u think, idk ur classical, but like even when i was 1200 online i used to beat 1100s in classical OTB, so my strength is ATLEAST 1300 right now thats what I can say.
1300 in 30min not blitz
Is chess.com mad or something? WHAT THE HELL IS THIS :C
Edit: As of 10mins later of the original post, this has been fixed.