Thanks for the advice. I have a question though, why would you start with 300 games and not The Game of Chess by Tarrasch?
Oh, and regarding my level, I would consider myself a beginner, but I used to train at a local club 4 years ago.
Thanks for the advice. I have a question though, why would you start with 300 games and not The Game of Chess by Tarrasch?
Oh, and regarding my level, I would consider myself a beginner, but I used to train at a local club 4 years ago.
The Game of Chess - Tarrasch Three Hundred Chess Games - Tarrasch How to Reassess Your Chess - Jeremy Silman The Amateur's Mind - Jeremy Silman Back to Basics: Tactics - Dan Heisman My Chess Career - Capablanca My Best Games - Anatoly Karpov How to Build Your Chess Reportoire - Steve Giddins Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual Improve Your Chess Now - Jonathan Tisdall The Middlegame (I and II) - Euwe and Kramer
These books span a very wide range of skill level in my view. It is like an assortment of piano music ranging from chopsticks to rachmaninoff.
I would read (and reread) the Tarrasch books, Amateur's Mind, Hesiman's Tactics book, and the Capablanca book before venturing into the others. Not sure the order within that. The Dvoretsky's book should definitely be read last, probably preceded by the Karpov book. The list seems thin on tactics/puzzle books.
Which Watson book are you referring to?
chessmicky wrote:
Well, "The Game of Chess" is considered a classic. In fact, famous chess author John Watson recently wrote that it reamins one of the very best instruction books ever written. My recommendation of "300 Games" is just based on the fact that I personally find well-annotated games a more fun way to learn.
Hello. I have read some but not all of the books. Here's my take on each:
Oh, ok, thank you. Sorry for not reading your post more carefully.
chessmicky wrote:
I was referring to a review of Tarrash's "The Game of Chess" that he wrote for The Week in Chess
...please!...if you are really starting, DO NOT waste a year readiong books over your head like i did; just focus on tactics, tactics, tactics, and once you are really done with tactics, the you can really try on ...tactics!...
My second best advice: start working with easy tactics over and over, repetiton, De la Maza, woodpecker method, call it what you like, but first work on a set of 500/1000 easy tactics until you kinow them as the face of your mum, before you tackle more complex positiona; of course you can do some hard puzzle from time to time, but what is going to help you in your own otb games to really see that double attack, is to have seen that "easy" pattern many times before, so you develop an intuition to look for it whenver the board offers you the oportunity...
I have most of the books on your list; i would recommend the 300 games by Tarrasch to read some games from time to time to relax from the hard work that tactics implies; you can play those games that are in correspondence with your fav openning; time ago i read the games in tahat book that featured the french and the Spanish openning...
all the best.
Oh...well!..my last advice: reading chess books DOES NOT make you any better (it hurts me still to remember, ouch!) ; just really working and sweating a bit through them eventually will. the more YOU invest, the more you will benefit.
Dan Heisman has a little different order with the Silman books. I won't go into how and why, but he explains that at his web site.
Yeah I know, the list is very inconsistent.
Maybe I should change the question to: "What alternate list would you recommend for a beginning chess player"
Your welcome
emzinator wrote:
Bronco70 wrote:
http://danheisman.home.comcast.net/~danheisman/Events_Books/General_Book_Guide.htm
AWESOME!!
I saw that webpage 3 or 4 years ago, but I could never remember where.
Thanks!
...please!...if you are really starting, DO NOT waste a year readiong books over your head like i did; just focus on tactics, tactics, tactics, and once you are really done with tactics, the you can really try on ...tactics!...
My second best advice: start working with easy tactics over and over, repetiton, De la Maza, woodpecker method, call it what you like, but first work on a set of 500/1000 easy tactics until you kinow them as the face of your mum, before you tackle more complex positiona; of course you can do some hard puzzle from time to time, but what is going to help you in your own otb games to really see that double attack, is to have seen that "easy" pattern many times before, so you develop an intuition to look for it whenver the board offers you the oportunity...
I have most of the books on your list; i would recommend the 300 games by Tarrasch to read some games from time to time to relax from the hard work that tactics implies; you can play those games that are in correspondence with your fav openning; time ago i read the games in tahat book that featured the french and the Spanish openning...
all the best.
Oh...well!..my last advice: reading chess books DOES NOT make you any better (it hurts me still to remember, ouch!) ; just really working and sweating a bit through them eventually will. the more YOU invest, the more you will benefit.
Great piece of advice, thanks!
I have the following chess books in my possession (without going into detail of why I chose to get each one):
I would appreciate if someone gave me some advice on how to set my priorities in terms of reading order of these books. I am a novice player who previously received training for a year and a half (4 years ago).