Right, I'll take the pole-position. You can see my miserable rating in here, 656. But I have a question to which I cannot find a single answer. It concerns a rather popular topic for beginners, it concerns openings. No, I'm not going to ask which one is better.
What I'm trying to clarify is this: Some authors argue that beginners should have a simplified opening repertoire (say, one white, one vs 1.e4, one vs 1.d4, for our purpose it does not matter the specifics of the openings selected). They argue that only with balanced development can you truly improve.
Some authors argue that beginners have nothing to do with openings and should stick to 'opening principles' and spend their time studying tactics ignoring any attempt to study openings. Tactics should be their only study material.
My question, for a beginner looking to improve what is the better path?
Hi friends, I open this post to solve all the doubts you could have about how to improve in chess. I appreciate it if you could attach the rating, the age and the country in the question to help you better.
International Master Alberto Chueca
https://www.albertochueca.com