Why i lose.. help me analyze this game...
Sort:
saya mulai dr yg pertama ya. Lgk 10. c4? Lgk c4 dijalankan pd saat hitam tdk menjalankan Nf6 atau ikatan marozy. Tujuannya adalah mencegah b5. Dalam hal ini b5 kan sudah jalan, jd lebih baik 10. Be2 trs 0-0. Mgk anggi jg bermaksud mencegah d5. Hitam pun kalau menghendaki d5 jg tdk susah. d5 dijalankan pada saat yg tepat akan sgt berbahaya. Next
In the first game, would there have been something wrong with 19. 0-0-0 rather than K d2? Pretty wild game with neither side castling , I would have done that rather than an all out attack before getting your king safe, possibly on the king's side. In the second game, is B xb5 a book line? I see the point of clearing out all black's Q side pawns. At the end, material is equal, you would have eventually had to give up one of your rooks, hopefully for 2 Q side pawns and a piece! Not sure why you resigned if that is what happened. Is that the whole game?
kedua, anggi enggak 0-0. f4 dijalankan jika ada dukungan dr benteng di f1 artinya 0-0 dulu. Sementara jalur setengah terbuka g malah menguatkan hitam. Kesimpulan anggi kurang memahami pertahanan ini dan akhirnya enggak punya planning. Menurut ahli sisilia variant di atas adalah pertahanan terbaik buat hitam. Dimana dgn formasi bidak e5, Be6 dan persiapan d6-d5. Trims
game yg kedua dalam tahap opening tdk ada yg salah. Memang bagi pemain yg berani akan menukarkan 1 perwira dgn 3 bidak lawan. Hanya lawan sdh mempersiapkan diri menghadapi variant ini. Utk sementara ini dulu berhubung sy lg pake hp trims
milestogo2 wrote:
In the first game, would there have been something wrong with 19. 0-0-0 rather than K d2? Pretty wild game with neither side castling , I would have done that rather than an all out attack before getting your king safe, possibly on the king's side. In the second game, is B xb5 a book line? I see the point of clearing out all black's Q side pawns. At the end, material is equal, you would have eventually had to give up one of your rooks, hopefully for 2 Q side pawns and a piece! Not sure why you resigned if that is what happened. Is that the whole game?
I Lose on time.. on game 2
kamabarus wrote:
kedua, anggi enggak 0-0. f4 dijalankan jika ada dukungan dr benteng di f1 artinya 0-0 dulu. Sementara jalur setengah terbuka g malah menguatkan hitam. Kesimpulan anggi kurang memahami pertahanan ini dan akhirnya enggak punya planning. Menurut ahli sisilia variant di atas adalah pertahanan terbaik buat hitam. Dimana dgn formasi bidak e5, Be6 dan persiapan d6-d5. Trims
iya om. biasanya buka pake d4.. ga persiapan lawan sicilia... :(
in both games too many moves wasted in opening-castle and develope all your pieces before making play
vin0413 wrote:
in both games too many moves wasted in opening-castle and develope all your pieces before making play
Which moves that being my blunder? please explain.. i need to learn :)
anggi, maksud vin mgk di kedua game anggi terlalu lama 0-0 artinya rokade adalah fase akhir dlm opening. Memang 2 game di atas anggi mengabaikan rokade. Trims
Anggi, segera melakukan 0-0........mungkin bisa membawa hasil yang menjanjikan.thx.
[COMMENT DELETED]
a coment deleted? :(
Both 12. f4 (game 1) and 8. ... Qc7 followed by 9. ... b5 (game 2) are blunders. Based on these blunders, I think you know many theoretical opening lines and standard plans, but don't understand them. If I am false, please explain your reason of these moves.
Additionally, the 2nd game should have been won by white. Luckily, your opponent can't convert his advantage to win.
recently i lose in 2 sicilian games both as white and as black against a person.. can someone tell me where is my blunder so i can fix it in other game
thanks...