4. Nxd4 or O-O

Sort:
CaChessToffee
Hi everyone, posting from phone so I hope this works. Been trying to learn Evans Gambit recently and I keep getting this position. Chess.com says O-O is best, stockfish says Nxd4. Just from people's experience of playing this opening, which one is usually better? Nxd4 makes sense to me as I don't like the Knight on d4 and after the exchange we're doing OK and slightly better than Black. Thoughts?

baddogno

That's the Blackburne Shilling, not the Evans gambit.  More than a few threads in the forums...

https://www.chess.com/forum/search?keyword=Blackburne+Shilling

CaChessToffee

Ah, I should have clarified. I understand this was not Evans Gambit, I just stated that as reasoning for my opening moves. I have just seen Nd4 a lot instead of Bc5 so was just wondering what people thought about it.

baddogno

Oh....Well if white doesn't know the trap and gets greedy, there's a world of hurt waiting for him.  I think Nxd4 followed by castling is the usual plan though and black is just behind.

poucin
Pawned064 a écrit :

Nxd4 is better as O-O seems premature to do.

It ruins pawn structure after 5.Nxf3 6.gxf3

6.Qxf3 is a legal move I think...

Everything is good against Nd4, even Nxe5 but if u want to get an easy advantage :

 

chamo2074

 

chamo2074
pfren a écrit :
Pawned064 έγραψε:

Nxd4 is better as O-O seems premature to do.

It ruins pawn structure after 5.Nxf3 6.gxf3

 

Is white's Queen glued at d1 or something?

Both moves are good, but I prefer 4.Nxd4 exd4 5.0-0 with c2-c3  and grabbing the center to follow (#7). Black usually tries to keep the pawn at d4, but here 5...Bc5? isn't possible because of the mini-combo 6.Bxf7+ etc.

Exactly what I said, I just didn't mention the f7 trick, good to see I think like an IM

sndeww

take the knight play castles and play f4 easy win

sndeww

if you play castles black can simply take the white knight without making any major concessions.

chamo2074
Preusseagro a écrit :

I will shock some people now as i did with my oponents

 

This is interesting, let me see what stockfish says

chamo2074

It likes Ke7 instead of Ke6

chamo2074

You don't have to have stockfish, just go to chess.com/analysis

chamo2074

No, you can go to personal analysis and see the variants with evaluation, the premium member have access to guided analysis FMK

x-9140319185

Looks like it transposes into the Traxler. It’s pretty much the line regardless if you take the bishop or not.

chamo2074

Not at all, this is completely different than the Traxler, in the Traxler, the bishop sac is with the black pieces, which matters except if White loses a tempo and the same position occurs. This is completely different

chamo2074

Also the opponent knight is not on f7 or g5, and not a lot is going on in terms of messiness of the board

x-9140319185

It looks like a reversed Traxler, due to the sacrifice and knight check. It is completely different, I agree, but it has similar themes.

chamo2074

Well yes ok, @TC800 if this is what you meant

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

why waste time w/ 4. Nxd4 or 0-0 ?? just sac at f7 and go !

push that Kn offa d4 w/ c3 clearing ur Q for f3. Black's emperor is wearing no clothes !

sndeww

If the sac worked everyone would play it but they dont