4 statistical subcategories of moves and openings

Yigor · 2017-07-12T12:35:23-07:00

This is our little joint work with Differentiation2, cf. https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/statistical-sharpness-and-evaluation https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/statistically-correct-moves-and-openings https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/statistically-excelle

Sort:

Yigor

Jul 25, 2017

#21

FaceCrusher: Thanks for your inspired post. For us, it was a surprise to see that 1...g6 is statistically almost as good as Sicilian. The whole Queen's gambit is statistically bad for black and it turns out that black doesn't have a really strong answer vs. 1. d4. That's also one of reasons why QP 1. e4 is better than KP 1. e4.