A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

there is no such line in the french...

Sicilian is good opening and it's not refuted although there's a dubious trap.

Here's the raw annotation of the trap above:

1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5= 3.d4?! dxe4?! 4.d5 e6? 5.Bb5+ Bd7!? 6. dxe6 Bxb5?? 7. exf7+ Ke7 8. fxg8=N+! Rxg8?? 9. Bg5+ 1-0

Well, here is a line from a 2010 (Small) ECO:

After that, it refers the reader to the C09 section (where one finds 1 e4 e6 2 d4 d5 3 Nd2 c5 4 exd5 exd5 5 Ngf3 Nc6).

he didn't write this though, nobody plays c3 immediately in the french 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. c3

Everyone can see what Tal125555 did write from what I reproduced. You, of course, can continue to dwell on that, or you can consider the 1 e4 c5 2 c3 e6 3 d4 d5 4 exd5 exd5 5 Nf3 Nc6 6 Bb5 Bd6 etc. line that the Small ECO provided along with a reference to the C09 section. I suppose another possibility is silence.

"There are not bad openings, only badly played ones."

Lajos Portish

he clearly showed the moves 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. c3 in the board, so not really. what you wrote has nothing to do with what he showed. you also yourself quoted that 2...e6 is a good move against c3. i don't really care what french position came after 10 moves. i won anyways

So, you want to claim that White "outplayed" Black "from the start", you now acknowledge that "2...e6 is a good move", and you don't want to consider 1 e4 c5 2 c3 e6 3 d4 d5 4 exd5 exd5 5 Nf3 Nc6 6 Bb5 Bd6 ?

why wont i consider it? i played Bb5

How would I know? All I can do is call attention to the amount of consideration that your posts have given to 6...Bd6, after my posts, made ~1 day ago, ~16 hours ago, ~15 hours ago, and ~7 hours ago. Only you can explain the reason for your choice.

i didn't have a choice to play 6...Bd6

You have a choice to consider (in a post) whether or not you want to say that Black was "outplayed from the start" in a game that started with 1 e4 c5 2 c3 e6 3 d4 d5 4 exd5 exd5 5 Nf3 Nc6 6 Bb5 Bd6.

what are you even saying? theres clearly no 6...Bd6 played in my win

If you are okay saying that Black was "outplayed from the start" in a game that began 1.e4 c5 2.c3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bb5 a6, why would there be any problem saying that Black was also "outplayed" during the moves, 1.e4 c5 2.c3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.Bb5 in another game?

i didnt have another game with this line though, so i see no need to answer this

e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 a6 "outplayed from the start"

e4 c5 c3 e6 d4 d5 exd5 exd5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Bd6 "[No comment.]"

"... You don't have to answer. ..." - Laura Branigan (1982)

I think move 6 is a good enough to say “outplayed from the start”.

you are right though, i don't have to answer it. you can mention the ...Bd6 line as much as you like, the moves in the game or its result isn't going to change

LMAO you only refute the weak arguments but just start making stuff up whenever somebody comes with a viable argument.