A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
snacktime10101

Bf5? thats interesting I might take up the d5 line again after seeing that

ChessBoy513

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

HolographWars
pfren wrote:
staples13 έγραψε:
 

Where have you been the last 1257 posts? It was proven well over a thousand posts ago

 

The only thing that was proven in the vast majority of the previous posts is that you are an idiot who cannot even troll properly.

The only thing proven here is that you cannot defend your thesis of the Sicilian is not refuted, and therefore, this guy isn’t relevant to the argument.

HolographWars

Just to say:

In a recent tournament I was pretty much lost in the opening when I faced the Alapin. Didn’t have much chance, was facing an 1850, and I just couldn’t defend.

HolographWars
robertjames_perez wrote:
 
This is highly unnoticed. This is the best way to fidht the Alapin Variation. Sadly this is less popular than many other moves. 

 

Because it gives White +0.7 on FishStock, unless I can’t read properly.

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
robertjames_perez wrote:
 
This is highly unnoticed. This is the best way to fidht the Alapin Variation. Sadly this is less popular than many other moves. 

 

Because it gives White +0.7 on FishStock, unless I can’t read properly.

You don't even know it's called Stockfish.

ChessBoy513

I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.

HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.

Obviously, is that relevant?

HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

ChessBoy513

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

which empire?

There were a bunch of empires in history.

dawson is a bit inactive currently.

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

ChessBoy513

@Holographwars and @staples13 see my current ongoing game against @viruschidai.

HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.

ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.

A little advantage, but I consider these stuff as refutations!!!!:

 

Reuben_Sammitch
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

ChessBoy513
Reuben_Sammitch님이 썼습니다:
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

Yes, but it's not correct.

Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.