I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.
Obviously, is that relevant?
I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.
Obviously, is that relevant?
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.
That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
which empire?
There were a bunch of empires in history.
dawson is a bit inactive currently.
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.
That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.
Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.
That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.
Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?
No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.
@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.
For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.
Here's a good line against Alapin:
+=
Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.
That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.
Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?
No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.
A little advantage, but I consider these stuff as refutations!!!!:
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.
Yes, but it's not correct.
Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.
Yes, but it's not correct.
Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.
Most of the time...
@staples13 and @holographwars
VS
@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.
You guys are outnumbered.
Don’t forget Dawson
And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.
Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.
Yes, but it's not correct.
Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.
Most of the time...
and this is one of those times.
Kim Jong Un should be ruling North Korea since the majority of its people supposedly think so.
1. Are we supposed to talk about politics?
2.That's not one of those times.
I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.