staples13 wrote:
Because 3 minute no increment blitz is by far the best time control
No it isn’t
A Bust to the Sicilian Defense
Sort:
Aug 29, 2019
0
#1184
Prove it. I’ll try to defend my Alapin against Any GM if you can set it up
Aug 29, 2019
0
#1185
Ok, I asked my friend, he’s not a GM but he’s about the same rating as you.
Aug 29, 2019
0
#1187
staples13 escribió:
Prove it. I’ll try to defend my Alapin against Any GM if you can set it up
Or play against the computer...
staples13 wrote:
Prove it. I’ll try to defend my Alapin against Any GM if you can set it up
how ridiculous> If you want a serious game do classical time so its not a time loss where you claim he resigned.
Aug 29, 2019
0
#1189
3 minute or 5 minute blitz. Those are my terms you may take it or leave it
Aug 29, 2019
0
#1190
Okay. I tell you even after e4 d5 c3 a5? white is not winning. put that in a engine not +1.8 or more
staples13 wrote:
... At this point Everyone knows that d5 and Nf6 lose by force. ...
“Both 2...Nf6 and 2...d5 are fine against the Alapin, and some players may also like 2...e6 or 2...g6.“ - IM pfren (September 4, 2018)
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=6
I am open to playing the Alapin against Carlsen.
Aug 30, 2019
0
#1193
Both of you, please play the Alapin against Stockfish and send me the link
Yeah against STOCKFISH.
Aug 30, 2019
0
#1196
No not stockfish, that’s boring. Find a GM willing to try to defend the Sicilian, and I’d be glad to play them
staples13님이 썼습니다:
No not stockfish, that’s boring. Find a GM willing to try to defend the Sicilian, and I’d be glad to play them
You're just scared to play Stockfish LEVEL 10.
Aug 30, 2019
0
#1198
ChessBoy513 wrote:
staples13님이 썼습니다:
No not stockfish, that’s boring. Find a GM willing to try to defend the Sicilian, and I’d be glad to play them
You're just scared to play Stockfish LEVEL 10.
So just to clarify you think an engine can successfully defend the Sicilian against me but not a GM?
staples13님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
staples13님이 썼습니다:
No not stockfish, that’s boring. Find a GM willing to try to defend the Sicilian, and I’d be glad to play them
You're just scared to play Stockfish LEVEL 10.
So just to clarify you think an engine can successfully defend the Sicilian against me but not a GM?
Just challenge @Stockfish right now rated 3 min blitz. If you don't it means Sicilian isn't refuted.
ChessBoy513 wrote:
staples13님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
staples13님이 썼습니다:
No not stockfish, that’s boring. Find a GM willing to try to defend the Sicilian, and I’d be glad to play them
You're just scared to play Stockfish LEVEL 10.
So just to clarify you think an engine can successfully defend the Sicilian against me but not a GM?
Just challenge @Stockfish right now rated 3 min blitz. If you don't it means Sicilian isn't refuted.
@Stockfish is being challenged.
Also, if you play against any GM, they won’t lose with the Sicilian