A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
Avatar of ChessBoy513

I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

I guarantee you if Fischer was alive he would crush you two.

Obviously, is that relevant?

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Avatar of ChessBoy513

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

which empire?

There were a bunch of empires in history.

dawson is a bit inactive currently.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

Avatar of ChessBoy513

@Holographwars and @staples13 see my current ongoing game against @viruschidai.

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 2 IMs are against you and I have a high rate with both KP and Sicilian they're not refuted.

For your information see my ongoing game against some 1200 in daily he has only a king left and I have a rook and pawn.

Here's a good line against Alapin:

 

+=

Computers always show that in the opening because of white's first-move advantage.

That sign won’t be a good for a serious player.

Are you saying chess is a forced win for white?

No, I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.

A little advantage, but I consider these stuff as refutations!!!!:

 

Avatar of Reuben_Sammitch
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
Reuben_Sammitch님이 썼습니다:
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

Yes, but it's not correct.

Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.

Avatar of HolographWars
ChessBoy513 wrote:
Reuben_Sammitch님이 썼습니다:
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

Yes, but it's not correct.

Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.

Most of the time...

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:
Reuben_Sammitch님이 썼습니다:
HolographWars wrote:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

@staples13 and @holographwars

VS

@kindaspongey, @snacktime10101, @ChessBoy513, @ChessProMasterGZ, @pfren, etc.

You guys are outnumbered.

Don’t forget Dawson

And the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

Numbers are irrelevant. If the argument is correct, it is correct regardless of how many or few support it.

Yes, but it's not correct.

Besides, the most of the time, the side with more support is usually right.

Most of the time...

and this is one of those times.

Avatar of HolographWars

Kim Jong Un should be ruling North Korea since the majority of its people supposedly think so.

Avatar of ChessBoy513
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:

Kim Jong Un should be ruling North Korea since the majority of its people supposedly think so.

1. Are we supposed to talk about politics?

2.That's not one of those times.

Avatar of kindaspongey
ChessBoy513 wrote:
HolographWars님이 썼습니다:
ChessBoy513 wrote:

… You guys are outnumbered.

... the rebels were very outnumbered (1000 to 1) yet they defeated the Empire.

which empire? There were a bunch of empires in history. ...

The one that struck back?

Avatar of kindaspongey
HolographWars wrote:

... I am not claiming an immediate win for White in the Alapin, but that it gives a solid advantage to White, and GMs would consider that to be a refutation.

"Objectively, the Alapin System is not that dangerous for Black. ..." - GM Mikhail Golubev (2017)