#60
The Alapin-Diemer has no logic at all: why give up a central pawn to put Bc1 at a passive position Be3 between pawns f2 and d4, as if it were a pawn itself?
Because it provides good trolling ground- or at least the O.P. thinks that a bucketful of nonsense that he's claiming at every one of his posts in this thread is good trolling.
One of these days he will probably understand that it is not, and I do not care when.
I figured out a bunch of gambits today