attack openings

Guys can you tell mme some attacks like the fried liver attack and more so i can win

yes

ok

The attack of the London?

The London is extremely solid, and mostly passive.

The colle zukertort however can be played both attacking and positional depending on if you favour the attacking idea with Ne5-f4 or c4.

In most variations in the London, black is the one putting pressure on white.

Seriously, OP, learn some gambits and counter-gambits; almost all of them were invented for launching a do-or-die attack. Pick a 1.e4 gambit and get to work, there are a large number of classical gambits to choose from: the Evans, the Kings, the Goring, the Vienna, the Danish, the Halasz, just to name a few. BTW, kick the Queens Gambit to the curb, where it belongs, play a real gambit. If someone plays 1.e4 and you are black, play the Latvian Gambit. Now you have all the information you need.

Can some one tell the LINES to the openings so I can use it plase for the latvian gambit

No?

skiiimjnnnbhhhhhh---do you wish to play openings that are attacking from move 1 or openings with the lowest draw rates, openings with the best win rates...or some combination of the 3? For example, the Danish Gambit Accepted attacks from move 1, has the lowest draw rates of any gambit, and a high win rate (as well as a high loss rate, something like 50% W/40% L/10% D below 2000 ELO). There are openings that have much lower loss rates, but the cost is much lower win rates and much higher draw rates, so you need to stop and ask yourself exactly what it is you want from your opening/defense? Whether black or white, openings are like engineering everything is a trade-off, nothing is free.

evans gambit clear

There is no such thing as a "Black Opening". The French Defense is not a "Black Opening". It is simply an opening. After 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5, the opening is the French Defense regardless of whether you have White or Black. The word Attack, Opening, or Defense, is simply based on who played the defining move of the opening.

Like 1.d4 (unknown) Nf6 (Unknown) 2.Bg5 (Trompowsky ATTACK)

1.e4 (unknown) c5 (Sicilian DEFENSE)

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 (Spanish OPENING)

But whether you play, after 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5, 2...c5, 2...e6, 2...Ne4, 2...d5, or something offbeat, it is still a Trompowsky Attack, even if you are Black, unless it transposes into something else, like 2...e6 3.e3 d5 4.Nbd2 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.Nf3 would transpose and no longer be a Trompowsky Attack. Instead, it would be a Torre Attack (1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.Bg5 d5 4.Nbd2 c5 5.e3 Nc6 6.c3).