http://www.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/French-Defense-Volume-One-The-76p3829.htm
http://www.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/French-Defence-The-76p3907.htm
I came across a book today by a 2700 GM Nikita Vitiugov - The French Defense - A Complete Black Repertoire. I havent read it yet. Any comments on how is this book?
If you don't like studying "theoretical" books then:
for nothing but full games in several French systems then "Winning with the French" featuring Uhlmann's games is excellent and enjoyable.
Some great players have used the French extensively. If you look at their best games collections in chronological order you'll get a good idea of how the French has evolved. I'd start with Nimzovich, move on to Botvinnik and Korchnoy, and finish with Short.
Fischer despised the French Defence and thought it was unsound and anti-positional. Nevertheless he often struggled against it, at the time in his career when his games with the Ruy Lopez and the Sicilian seemed like forced wins for White. Studying his games as White against the French would also be illuminating.
John French?
You possibly mean John's Watson's "Play the French IV", which, unlike the first three editions of the book, is rather a poor one.
The way opening books are authored has changed drastically over the last few years, but unfortunately Watson still lives in the early eighties.
I was thinking of buying the 4th edition of the Watson book. Could you say more about why you dislike this book, especially in comparison to the earlier three editions?
[Reposted due to formatting problems involving the block quote.]
"... [Play the French: 4th Edition by IM John Watson] is well beyond the level of most players rated below 1800, but for ambitious players, both those employing the French as black or playing 1 e4 should invest in this book without hesitation." - FM Carsten Hansen (2012)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627015516/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen163.pdf
Having played the French for 10 years before quitting it in 2007, I can tell you the best book on the French for someone who is not yet a seasoned French player is "Mastering The French With the Read and Play Method". It explains it based on pawn structures rather than reams of variations.
Feel free to read whatever you find useful, Penthouse included. [...]
That and the "how much do you pay?" made my day. x)
I should read this thread with a popcorn box at arm length.
Feel free to read whatever you find useful, Penthouse included. [...]
That and the "how much do you pay?" made my day. x)
I should read this thread with a popcorn box at arm length.
And I should get Popcorn ready for this thread, reading posts like your #7.
You don't "make" books. You "write" them (and "publish" them)! They may be flat like pancakes, but you still don't "make" books like you do pancakes!
Thanks for the reply. But you say this volume contains lots of mistakes and you back that up by giving one mistake in some sideline? That just isn't right. You should come up with much more than that if you want to prove your statement.
How much do you pay for that?
He'll give you a shiny new Lincoln for each one, and NOT the car! You can figure out what new Lincolns you'll get!
Having played the French for 10 years before quitting it in 2007, I can tell you the best book on the French for someone who is not yet a seasoned French player is "Mastering The French With the Read and Play Method". It explains it based on pawn structures rather than reams of variations.
I was impressed with Tony Kosten's "Mastering the Nimzo-Indian: With the Read and Play Method" in the same series, which I found at a library.
Unfortunately both books are out of print. The Nimzo book has come down in price on Amazon but the French version is still pricey: $47 used, $237 new.
I'll have to keep an eye for a reasonable copy of the French book. Written by Neil McDonald, whom I also like.
If you can't find the Read and Play Method book, Everyman has just started a "First Steps" series, which appears to be geared toward first timers with an opening and explained at a lower rating level.
The first one in the series just came out, and guess what opening it is? You guess it! The French!
Here's the link for the book at USCF Sales. You can also get this at Amazon, one of many chess specialty shops like Chess4Less, or the Everyman Publishing site itself.
http://www.uscfsales.com/catalog/product/view/id/16242/s/first-steps-the-french/category/137/
Actually, I have heard from some people, including an IM, that the 4th edition of "Play the Frech" was a little disappointing. But for a class playey like me, it's still a valuable resource. I rely on it heavily. As my French Defense expertise grows, perhaps I'll become more aware of its shortcoming, but for now I find it very useful. And it had gotten really thick!
I have had a previous edition, I want to say the 3rd, but might have been the 2nd. Either way, I wouldn't recommend any of them as a players "First Resource" on the French Defense.
After you have a solid foundation of the basics of the French Defense, like many that have never played it don't even know that outside maybe the Exchange Variation, Black's target is almost always d4, only then would I suggest Watson's book. It's too theory-ridden for someone learning the French for the first time!
I am going through the Aagaard book on holiday and find it good, well written and with different suggestions.
I am going through the Aagaard book on holiday and find it good, well written and with different suggestions.
Man , you are really clueless.
Uhlman won the best players of his time with French defense(Fischer , Geller, Bronstein , Velimirovic,Ciocaltea , Pachman etc) and every one of them knew he would play French defense.He didn't even bother to avoid their preparation.
Better avoid comments on things you don't know.
Jengaias, I did not say Uhlmann was a patzer. First, it would be hard to be Grandmaster at the same time...
As a matter of fact I started with "he was a grandmaster, he probably won a lot of games with great style" and then I simply added "but among all my books I think I don't have a single annoted game where he wins", underlining the feeling that I have only seen the game where he was on the wrong side in these books.
Besides, I specified in #22 "Maybe my interest in Polugaevski's games, or crushing victories that impressed me and that I memorised such as Vasiukov-Uhlmann gave me this false impression (the impression being that I have always seen Ulhmann's losses in my books, not that Uhlmann was a loser...)".
So I do know Uhlmann's value, and I was speaking about my perception of what was shown of him in my books collection.
No need to jump the gun, you better slow down on coffee. ;)