Defences to the Parham Attack

What is the Soller-Gambit?

+1

or

Funny opening and completely refuted 

One of my favorite choices against 1.d4

I just played the Parham, against an engine at 1650. Maybe I'm just not good enough at the nuances of the Parham, but after Qh5...Nc6, well, if the engine hadn't placed that N there...

No, I just ended up retreating with the Q, losing tempo... I did end up winning, but no thanks to the Parham.

Really?

Yes, you can't refute the Parham by playing a different move. That's like saying the Ruy Lopez is refuted because of the sicilian. You're just distracting us from the undefeatable lines of the Parham.

The parham is an instant loss for white because all of the positions that have been reached, even the ones where jetfighter hung a piece, are good for black (because I say they are). No one can argue with me, as I evaluate black's attack as unstoppable, and I am obviously better than all of you players, even IM pfren.

I agree, arguing like this is fun!

Is that why you got whipped by the Parham?

See more facism? All the whatupyodog accounts get banned, and the only one who actually did anything wrong. Whatupyodog is just a high rated player that likes the Parham, and therefore gets banned. That's why I gotta keep my rating low.

If you look at the game in any detail at all, I had a winning advantage and blundered a mating sequence.  And what do you mean people like shepi, you don't even know me.

Thinking about it, I bet your whatupyodog with a different name. No one else would side with Gavi.

Except non-trolls.

how exactly do you define "fascism" ??

LOL

well considering whatup's newest incarnation just got banned I figure I can post the following game where I had all the chances. I was a normal opening too. no Parham BS. though he did try 3. Qf3. that was so easy to counter.

http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=54540554

the link to the game. still have three days to wait for the already known out come to come out.

Jetfighter, you had nothing.

And CS- that sounds like something shepi would say. I said you all say this is bad, and give no evidence as to why, except "wastes a tempo".

It shows how the h6 g5 system opens your kingside, and leaves you vulnerable to attack.

Well every opening is equal at top level, otherwise there'd only be one opening played.

why I had two pieces developed. a position with 0 flaws. he can't develop his King's Knight properly his Bishop has already moved twice he has nothing for the tempo chasing my knight arround because he wasted it with Qf3. a GM would favor my position. I favor my position lets ask the engines who has an advantage in the following.

Not really, the Ruy Lopez hands it over on spot. Black must play accurately in the Parham to not get crushed.

Why do people call it 960 when the proper name for is is Fischer Random?  I think its because of so much hate for Bobby these days..

but then here is what happens according to his logic just like Bongcloud people do