And in that board white has much better position :P
Establishing Parham Theory
Sort:
The Parham is real. Look at the board, white is just as good as he is in other openings.
White isn't winning in the Ruy Lopez, at least he is winning in the board you gave...
I am trying to be productive.
I don't think that proves much, boards help. I'd accept, but even if I win (not saying I would), these trolls would just say you made an error and keep saying the Parham sucks.
I am trying to show the rest of you how this is good. You sit there and post boards and think it's the best thing ever when you are clearly losing, and then say I troll.
Computers don't play the Parham correctly, so yes, you are an idiot taking computer moves that make no sense. It's the Parham attack, not the Parham castle.
You are rated 800 higher than me, I am going to lose, because I am not rated 2100.
I don't engine, that's just shepi and CS. However, you look like an engine-user, your blitz and live ratings are 500 lower than online, that's pretty suspicious to me...
I think if White can play Qg3 and f4 before Black plays f5 White might be able to get an even position.
CHCL, he can also play the mainlines we have discussed and get a winning position. I watched a Parham video by IM Andrew Martin, he suggested that, but Nh5 hurts white.
And CBA, or maybe it's just the games that you don't have enough time to engine on?
What is the main line? I thought that was it.
No the Parham gives an attack, it is actually much better than most attacking openings, but I don't see how it is fair for you to say "The Parham doesn't attack it sucks.", and, "The Ruy Lopez doesn't attack it's great". This proves you are just trolling away.