How playable is this?

Sort:
Avatar of Samurai-X

How playable is this for White on all levels?
Avatar of oinquarki

Definitely playable. Whether it's sound is debatable.

Avatar of StrategicusRex

It's playable, but if Black knows the Schlecter Defense, then White's plan of an all out (and often sacrificial) attack is busted.

Avatar of StrategicusRex

I think the term "playable" is often used interchangeably with "good".  The way I see it, every move, opening, and combination you can think if is "playable".  Whether or not it is good is up to you and all those analysts (both human and computer) out there.

Avatar of Samurai-X

I thought it would be pretty clear what I meant: capable of being played on a reasonably successful level when compared to the more common openings. Obviously it's playable for beginners, almost anything is, but I was just interested in knowing whether or not it was worth getting into on the levels above. Maybe, as theweaponking mentioned, there are responses which are effective enough to make it not worth pursuing.

Avatar of Samurai-X
theweaponking wrote:

I think the term "playable" is often used interchangeably with "good".  The way I see it, every move, opening, and combination you can think if is "playable".  Whether or not it is good is up to you and all those analysts (both human and computer) out there.


Exactly. Why would I use "playable" by its literal definition.

Avatar of StrategicusRex

Yeah, I understood what you meant up there.  That's called the Danish Gambit and I believe it to possibly be playable up to around maybe...2000 strength?  But after a while, you just run into the Schlecter too much or other strong responses that make it almost not worth playing at that high a level.  In essence, it's "too easy" for Black to play against it.

Avatar of gambit13

I think the Danish is pretty sound based upon these results

http://www.chess.com/opening/eco/C21_Danish_Gambit

http://www.chess.com/opening/eco/C21_Danish_Gambit_Accepted_Schlechter_Defense

Avatar of erikido23

 Funny thing is from those two lines it looks like with best play you have a middlegame/endgame without queens and a majority on opposite sides.  Looks like the better player wins it to me(or the player who understands this type of  position better.

 

 

However d3 and d5 statistically are horrible for white

Avatar of erikido23
Fezzik wrote:

I think it's been analysed to a draw, which is why it's not seen above ~2200 level except as a surprise weapon. It's a good weapon for scholastic players though.

John Nunn, in Nunn's Chess Openings, considers several of the positions arising from the Danish to be unclear, but he has hidden the most clear drawing line in his notes.


 care to enlighten us?

Avatar of gambit13
erikido23 wrote:

 Funny thing is from those two lines it looks like with best play you have a middlegame/endgame without queens and a majority on opposite sides.  Looks like the better player wins it to me(or the player who understands this type of  position better.

 

 

However d3 and d5 statistically are horrible for white


 Very unlikely for a queen trade when one player is 2 pawns down. White will hold on to queen while black attempts queen trades. As it is a gambit, queens are highly likely to stay on the board

Avatar of erikido23
gambit13 wrote:
erikido23 wrote:

 Funny thing is from those two lines it looks like with best play you have a middlegame/endgame without queens and a majority on opposite sides.  Looks like the better player wins it to me(or the player who understands this type of  position better.

 

 

However d3 and d5 statistically are horrible for white


 Very unlikely for a queen trade when one player is 2 pawns down. White will hold on to queen while black attempts queen trades. As it is a gambit, queens are highly likely to stay on the board


 looks like you didn't look at the links

Avatar of Guest2125861957
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.