How the chess opening begins depends on the character of the person.

Sort:
yetanotheraoc
Artur460 wrote:

CAN YOU HEAR ME? I told you, ...

Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they were not listening. For you I recommend placid openings such as Russian Defense and Queen's Gambit Accepted. This will help you calm down.

Artur460
yetanotheraoc написал:
Artur460 wrote:

CAN YOU HEAR ME? I told you, ...

Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they were not listening. For you I recommend placid openings such as Russian Defense and Queen's Gambit Accepted. This will help you calm down.

Understand, I am not aggressive and I am not angry, I just said 3 times why I think that the statement that the choice of the opening and strategy in it is closely related to the character of the person himself, and here the person did not tell me some logical refutation of the words while saying quite different opinions he got bored playing d4, why, and why then others are not bored. All because of the characteristics of the character and personality of a person, if they were not all playing the same opening (for example, only e4). And it seems to me that he is quite a smart person, but for some reason he did not notice such an error in his arguments, which made me a little angry, but clearly not to the point that: "Go play Russian defense, calm down!" I am not angry at a person if he has the opposite opinion, I just hate it when a person refutes something without supporting the words with facts. So don't think that I'm aggressive and constantly attacking everyone with a FONT LIKE THIS.

Artur460
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
I have noticed more than once that the choice of a chess opening depends on the character. Different friends of mine play different chess openings. However, similar in character people play similar openings. Perhaps the choice of the chess openings depends on the style of the game, and already the style depends on the character. In general, you can tell your character traits and how this is reflected in the choice of your openings.

I have a set repertoire based on getting playable and enjoyable positions or middle game.

Sometimes, it’s a matter of mood. For example, I play e4 the odd time instead of c4. Within c4, there’s options of various Reversed Sicilian games or Botvinnik  System.

As black, the Sicilian is my only reply but I bounce around with the Dragondorf, e6 and O’Kelly depending on what white is trying to do and where I target counter play.

For the most part, it’s instincts for me to counter attack than defend.

You have all noticed quite correctly both the opening strategy and the peculiarities of your game style, and what can you say about yourself as a person. Maybe your counterattacking style of play has something to do with your characteristics as a person?

Chuck639
Artur460 wrote:
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
I have noticed more than once that the choice of a chess opening depends on the character. Different friends of mine play different chess openings. However, similar in character people play similar openings. Perhaps the choice of the chess openings depends on the style of the game, and already the style depends on the character. In general, you can tell your character traits and how this is reflected in the choice of your openings.

I have a set repertoire based on getting playable and enjoyable positions or middle game.

Sometimes, it’s a matter of mood. For example, I play e4 the odd time instead of c4. Within c4, there’s options of various Reversed Sicilian games or Botvinnik  System.

As black, the Sicilian is my only reply but I bounce around with the Dragondorf, e6 and O’Kelly depending on what white is trying to do and where I target counter play.

For the most part, it’s instincts for me to counter attack than defend.

You have all noticed quite correctly both the opening strategy and the peculiarities of your game style, and what can you say about yourself as a person. Maybe your counterattacking style of play has something to do with your characteristics as a person?

Outside and before chess as a person, I have been described as a hardworking, ambitious and versatile. Could explain why I like counter attacking vs defending positions.

My educational background is engineering and business so that would explain my preference for  flexibility, versatility, tactical and complex games whereby my analytical skills are strengths.

Artur460
NervesofButter написал:

"...the person did not tell me some logical refutation..."

I haven't read all the posts here so forgive me if this has been answered or addressed.  Have you supplied Logic that backs up your opinion?  I ask this because asking someone to supply a logical refutation to your answer if you did not supply logic that backs up your claim?

Just asking.

If you are talking about my statement that the choice and convenience in opening depends on the character, then yes, I have provided a lot of confirmation of my words, both by examples and by collecting logical consequences proving the correctness of this statement.

Artur460
afternooneveryone написал:

Дергается, когда нервная
нездоровая одержимость определенной пищи
фыркать во время смеха
помешаны на уборке
бормотать свое мнение при себе постоянно
разговаривать с животным, когда чувствовал себя одиноко в
очках без необходимости
нарушения сна
стеснялся есть в присутствии других
, опасаясь за чепуху
несет ноутбук с них
галлюцинирует
заблуждение
зависит от близких
зрительная память
просто иметь воображаемых друзей,
беседовать с растениями стены и мебель
принимая чай слишком много,
можете не ездить [adinserter имени=”Блок 1"]
левша
типа с одним пальцем
зависимости съесть или выпить что-нибудь
заснуть легко и в любом месте
Чувствуете себя сонным, когда делаешь путешествовать
взрослые люди, но по-прежнему любит играть с игрушками, как плюшевый мишка
хочет выглядеть по-разному
осознает брендов
имеет разный друг/ подруга каждую неделю
движется, как танцевать, а делать работу
просто донести/впечатление
прохождения улыбку без каких-либо шуткой или по причине
крайней стеснительности во время разговора с другим
и зубочисткой во рту
и суеверен до крайности
делают ту же работу снова и снова, как мытье рук
отношений с питомцем
мечты, постоянно
имея социальная фобия
мальчиков с женским привычкам, как скрещивание ног
женщины используют мужские духи
не можем держать долгосрочные отношения
Хотите перемен в жизни каждый день
Собирайте мех животных, кости и кожу
Старайтесь читать мысли других
Сломанные вещи, когда сердитесь
Никогда не видели без макияжа, всегда есть блеск и палочка
для еды Чувствует себя виноватым из-за маленьких ошибок
Всегда ведет себя как подозрительное
Ухо их ногти и кожа вокруг ногтей
Никогда не завязывает их обувь.

These are not character traits, this is a feature of the person himself.

Artur460
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
I have noticed more than once that the choice of a chess opening depends on the character. Different friends of mine play different chess openings. However, similar in character people play similar openings. Perhaps the choice of the chess openings depends on the style of the game, and already the style depends on the character. In general, you can tell your character traits and how this is reflected in the choice of your openings.

I have a set repertoire based on getting playable and enjoyable positions or middle game.

Sometimes, it’s a matter of mood. For example, I play e4 the odd time instead of c4. Within c4, there’s options of various Reversed Sicilian games or Botvinnik  System.

As black, the Sicilian is my only reply but I bounce around with the Dragondorf, e6 and O’Kelly depending on what white is trying to do and where I target counter play.

For the most part, it’s instincts for me to counter attack than defend.

You have all noticed quite correctly both the opening strategy and the peculiarities of your game style, and what can you say about yourself as a person. Maybe your counterattacking style of play has something to do with your characteristics as a person?

Outside and before chess as a person, I have been described as a hardworking, ambitious and versatile. Could explain why I like counter attacking vs defending positions.

My educational background is engineering and business so that would explain my preference for  flexibility, versatility, tactical and complex games whereby my analytical skills are strengths.

Well, yes, there is a relationship. You like positions in which both you and the opponent always need to find the best move.

Chuck639
Artur460 wrote:
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
Chuck639 написал:
Artur460 wrote:
I have noticed more than once that the choice of a chess opening depends on the character. Different friends of mine play different chess openings. However, similar in character people play similar openings. Perhaps the choice of the chess openings depends on the style of the game, and already the style depends on the character. In general, you can tell your character traits and how this is reflected in the choice of your openings.

I have a set repertoire based on getting playable and enjoyable positions or middle game.

Sometimes, it’s a matter of mood. For example, I play e4 the odd time instead of c4. Within c4, there’s options of various Reversed Sicilian games or Botvinnik  System.

As black, the Sicilian is my only reply but I bounce around with the Dragondorf, e6 and O’Kelly depending on what white is trying to do and where I target counter play.

For the most part, it’s instincts for me to counter attack than defend.

You have all noticed quite correctly both the opening strategy and the peculiarities of your game style, and what can you say about yourself as a person. Maybe your counterattacking style of play has something to do with your characteristics as a person?

Outside and before chess as a person, I have been described as a hardworking, ambitious and versatile. Could explain why I like counter attacking vs defending positions.

My educational background is engineering and business so that would explain my preference for  flexibility, versatility, tactical and complex games whereby my analytical skills are strengths.

Well, yes, there is a relationship. You like positions in which both you and the opponent always need to find the best move.

You brought up a great point of finding the best move. One of my chess goals is accurate play. It’s frustrating missing a critical move or tactic. I still do miss those things but not as ignorantly compared to the past.

I think one of the reasons in increasing my accuracy in the last month vs year is contributed to achieving playable or superior positions. I am working on tactics at the moment and hope to successfully apply them after achieving superior positions. That’s the plan at least lol 

StevieG65
My character, or so people say, is calm and careful. When I first studied chess, I played calm and careful openings. I only started improving when I started playing sharp and aggressive openings.
darkunorthodox88

Lakdawala seems to think so.

Im unsure, i lean on the "it does" camp.

but things get muddy quickly. Experienced players are more likely to make informed choices but they value things like preparation and first move advantage more. Weaker players may not have such inhibitions but stick to what catches their fancy with limited information or plain habit.

Artur460
darkunorthodox88 написал:

Lakdawala seems to think so.

Im unsure, i lean on the "it does" camp.

but things get muddy quickly. Experienced players are more likely to make informed choices but they value things like preparation and first move advantage more. Weaker players may not have such inhibitions but stick to what catches their fancy with limited information or plain habit.

well, I agree, this is more present in beginners or average players, and strong players rely on openings that give the greatest advantage in the game, but still strong players use different openings, those that are more convenient for them in the style of play, and as I said, the style of play depends on the character.