Poucin, you're learning!
how to break C00 French?
Sort:
Why do people waste their time with X_TLDR_OMGWTF_X posts?
SilentKnighte5 wrote:
Why do people waste their time with X_TLDR_OMGWTF_X posts?
My name is X_PLAYER_J_X
Furthermore, Poucin is the one who decided to say my advice was bad.
When my advice is good.
Poucin advice is the one which is highly flawed.
Most people on this forum can't even comprehend what Poucin is even saying.
Thus, What they do is unknowingly agree with him.
The reason they unknowingly agree with him is because they realize he has a title.
They feel since he has a title there is a high likelihood that he will be right more than he is wrong about chess related stuff.
However, there does crop up times when he is wrong.
It may not happen very often.
However, It has happened in this thread.
For the ones who do comprehend what Poucin is saying they don't even dare to question the statements given.
Even if the statements given are wrong.
They would rather be spoon feed lies and be satisfied with the lies than to say anything.
This is the mentality of the sheep trying to follow the leader.
A leader who is walking them off a cliff.
Do they even care? Nope!
They are so happy to be part of the group in the line.
They don't even see the cliff!
How dare I expose the French, Wing Gambit for what it really is!!!
Nothing more than a bad opening which gives up 1 pawn.
Black even has the luxury to give the won pawn back at the right time to get a better position!
I already gave references to what GM Roman said.
He stated in his own words the Wing Gambit is a bad opening.
Poucin responses to these claims??
4 - I respect Roman Dzindzi, i use several of his recommendations, but he is also known for giving uncomplete analysis, and even wrong sometimes, so it is not the best source u can find in my opinion.
The above statement is nothing more than an admission of defeat!
6 - Why a 6th point, i dont know, anyway i think arguing with u is hopeless because seemingly, u dont understand what u read, u interpret thinking all the world is against u, u should see the positive side sometimes...
Please guys! I don't want to misinterpret Poucin words!
Heaven forbid the whole world is against me apparently.
When you read statement number 4 what does that mean to you?
My interpretation is Poucin believes Roman's analysis on the Wings Gambit is incomplete!
Which I believe is nothing more than a hilarious joke!
However, you know me!
I sure don't understand anything I read apparently!
What does Roman saying the Wing Gambit is a bad opening have to do with Poucin responding with Roman is known for incomplete analysis?
People on this forum than have the nerve to say I am the one wasting time???
HA HA
Well than go follow Poucin advice and play the Wings Gambit!
When you get crushed don't come crying to me!
I told you from the beginning it was bad.
I gave a simple line which little kids play.
My recommended the Kings Indian Attack!
It is not considered the greatest line in chess.
However, it is at least labeled good!
Roman himself even said it was good line.
Roman said Wings Gambit is bad line.
Poucin believes my advice on the KIA is bad because you can't learn the KIA in a single week.
Well to be honest.
I don't think any line in chess can be mastered in a single week!
Does a 1400 player expect to Master a chess line in a single week?
It is rubbish.
At least the line I mentioned is considered good.
It isn't labeled bad!
What is even more funny is after insulting my advice.
Poucin goes and talks about the French Exchange!!
HA HA
exchange variation for white is the first step toward defeat, black shouldnt fear it...
Wait until someone tells GM Meizes about this!
He uses the below move order 1.c4 e6 2.e4
He has a crushing score with the white pieces.
Which the same moves can be played if you play 1.e4
French Defense/Exchange Variation/Monte Carlo Variation
The French Defense/Exchange Variation is so terrible that even the Patzer Garry Kasparov played it!
Should we do a vote?
KIA > Wing Gambit
Exchange Variation > Wing Gambit
Advanced Variation > Wing Gambit
Tarrasch Variation > Wing Gambit
Mainline > Wing Gambit
Two Knights Variation > Wing Gambit
2.b3 > Wing Gambit
It is obvious!
The Wing Gambit is a bullet opening.
Mar 20, 2016
0
#85
The Wing Gambit is a fun weapon against an unprepared French player. Though I find the main lines put much better pressure on black.
Interestingly enough, my first win over an International Master in standard time controls? I played the French defense against the Wing Gambit. :D
(I declined the gambit with b6. But these days I play c5-c4, or accept it.)
jengaias wrote:
Never before in the history of chess a guy has used so many words to say just one thing:
"I am totally ignorant".
I am sorry to tell you this Jengaias; however, no one is even listening to what you are saying.
Ever since you stated Tal was a positional player.
You have lost all credibility on the forums.
I am the only one responding to you because I am such a nice person.
It really is a sad situation indeed.
Play Nc3 and follow up Bb4 with the mainline and just push h4 h5 h6 h7 and then play a chess game. If your opponent responds with Nf6 play Bg5, e5, and then h4. Then play a chess game.
There's no refutation but I find that those two variations give me positions where I can try to win.
Mar 20, 2016
0
#88
Of course Tal was a positional player. But the word "positional" doesn't mean a specific style. It means that he made moves that fit the demands of the position.
Someone once said that Tal's style was easy to understand: he developed his pieces towards the center, then sacrificed them somewhere.
Playing the closed sicilian with the queen on e2 ( lost tempo ) is a thing of beauty ( it does not have to ) I suppose.
it is not a closed sicilian if u play c3 instead of Nc3...
White has some possible manoeuvre not available in closed sicilian : Nd2-f1-h2, typical KIA, and also Na3-Nc2, for d4 control, and of course, after playing c3 u have d4 in mind when well prepared.
Of course if white is careless and play Nc3 in the opening, then it would be a bad closed sicilian.
But all this depends on black's set up, and u have to study each one to understand subtleties with move order and strategy to adopt.
All of the above without the queen on e2. How does it sound?
MonkeyH wrote:
Play two knights variation
Although it's hard to say what you are going to use, we don't really know what kind of positions you like, two knights position just let you play chess instead of using some kind of theory opening book because you don't have enough time to learn that before sunday.
theory gone wrong bro
Main theory above.
X player poucin was correct about gm Roman. Some of the advice he gives would lead you to believe he's no more than a huckster. A friend of mine was telling me he tried a line that gm Roman recommended and got crushed pretty easily. So he checked to see where he went wrong and the engine said that the position where Roman ended his analysis and said "black is perfectly fine" was actually already +2 for white. Roman is in need of money so he throws out these lines no one else recommends to sell DVDs. And then you find out there's very good reason no one else talks about these lines. I'm not saying everything he says is like this but he lays his fair share of eggs.
GM williams is the best!!
I know it isn't a "2-4 days" opening, but I play the Tarrasch. It isn't much theory, and you always get a little bit of pressure.
@poucin
You probably know better than me on this one, but I guess what I'm saying is that it suits my needs for three reasons:
1. The positions stay nice and rational.
2. It isn't a high-maintenance opening. You don't need to memorize much if you don't want to.
3. In both main lines, White gets some sort of target to play against.
AnimalMaster3 wrote:
Play the Entry defence!!!!
lol.It gives black a great advantage.
Igor Glek is so Pro! He became a FIDE Arbiter like last year!
I will not argue anymore with Poucin, condescending.