Is fried liver attack Good??

Sort:
sndeww

"an inaccuracy by black (taking on d5) and a mistake by white (taking on f7)" - Finegold

tictactoeprodigy
SNUDOO wrote:

"an inaccuracy by black (taking on d5) and a mistake by white (taking on f7)" - Finegold

finegold the goat

sndeww
Preusseagro wrote:
SNUDOO hat geschrieben:

"an inaccuracy by black (taking on d5) and a mistake by white (taking on f7)" - Finegold

Nxf7 Never a misstake only the destruction of black.

not my quote.  I don't have an opinion.

poucin
Preusseagro a écrit :
SNUDOO hat geschrieben:

"an inaccuracy by black (taking on d5) and a mistake by white (taking on f7)" - Finegold

Nxf7 Never a misstake only the destruction of black.

It is not so clear...

Anyway, calling "Ng5 the Fried liver while Nxf7 is the fegatello" just shows your ignorance, so we shouldn't take seriously what u are talking about this opening.

kamodo2006

In my opinion, I think the fried liver should only be played once the player is moderately confident with the attack and its different variations. It is good to learn since it so effective, especially against certain types of players (leave you to figure this out if you're interested). Happy Chess!

tictactoeprodigy
Preusseagro wrote:
tictactoeprodigy hat geschrieben:

the fried liver is taking on f7 afaik. in the database, if you dont take, its just the knight attack.

talking on f7 is called fegatello atack 

you can ...talk on f7?!

in b4 the edit

sndeww

Ya know, I have a *small* feeling that english isn't preusseagro's first language.

tictactoeprodigy

taking on f7 is fried liver.

Prometheus_Fuschs
pfren escribió:
infestationPit έγραψε:

Fried Liver is good for White. 

 

Proof?

Statistics, engine evals and overall analysis?

Prometheus_Fuschs

Truth be told, 5... Na5 (Polerio Defense) or 5... b5 (Ulvestad Variation) are much better than 5... Nxd5.

DerekDHarvey

I like fried liver as black or white.

DerekDHarvey

The jury is still out after 400 years.

 

DerekDHarvey

If Black heads for c7 with his King and is prepared to return the material at the right moment then the better player wins.

Pancracio2020
monsterchip escribió:

The Fried Liver Attack holds the award for the coolest opening name in chess. This variation of the Two-Knights Defense involves a bold knight sacrifice which forces the black king to take a walk. This variation is also known as the Fegatello Attack, an Italian term which means "dead as a piece of meat!" 

 

The key position in the Fried Liver Attack.

Let's take a look at what moves bring about this opening:

 

In Italian, fegatello doesn't mean "dead as a piece of meat". It means small liver. That's how they call a dish made of fried pork liver. It looks this way:

Fegatello di maiale © TripAdvisor

 

Prometheus_Fuschs
pfren escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs έγραψε:
pfren escribió:
infestationPit έγραψε:

Fried Liver is good for White. 

 

Proof?

Statistics, engine evals and overall analysis?

 

Only the first applies, if you include woodpusher games.

The thing is, there aren't many master games playing the Fried Liver Attack, I wonder why...

TimmInMinn

That is cool as heck!

TimmInMinn

#24

Prometheus_Fuschs
pfren escribió:
Prometheus_Fuschs έγραψε:
pfren escribió:
infestationPit έγραψε:

Fried Liver is good for White. 

 

Proof?

Statistics, engine evals and overall analysis?

 

Only the first applies, if you include woodpusher games.

And also Stockfish dev doesn't think highly of it:


r1bq1b1r/ppp3pp/4k3/3np3/1nB5/2N2Q2/PPPP1PPP/R1B1K2R w KQ - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 080820:

9.0-0 c6 10.d4 Df6 11.De2 Re7 12.dxe5 Dg6 13.Ce4 Rd8 14.c3 Af5 15.f3 Ca6 16.Axa6 bxa6 17.Dxa6 Ac8 18.Da5+ Re8 19.c4 Cb6 20.b3 Ah3 21.Tf2 Af5 22.Cg3 Rf7 23.e6+ Axe6 24.f4 Ag4 25.f5 Dd6 26.Ab2 Te8 27.Te1 Txe1+ 28.Dxe1 Ae7 29.c5 Dd1 30.Dxd1 Axd1 31.cxb6 axb6 32.Ce4 Te8 33.f6 gxf6 34.Axf6 Axf6 35.Txf6+ Rg7 36.Td6 Axb3 37.axb3 Txe4 38.Txc6 Tb4 39.Tc3 h5 40.Rf2 Rf6 41.Tf3+ Rg5 42.Tg3+ Rf6 43.Re2 h4 44.Td3 Rf5 45.Tf3+ Re5 46.g3 Td4 47.Td3 Tb4 48.Rd2 hxg3 49.hxg3 Rf5 50.Re2 Rg6 51.Rf2 Rg5 52.Rf3 Rf5 53.Rg2 Re5 54.Tf3
+/- (1.09) Profundidad: 61/99 03:06:43 41549MN, tb=912215

poucin

nice analysis, very helpful and informative...

Prometheus_Fuschs

It's not meant to be either, it just answers the actual question...