ghostofmaroczy realized what a smart person I am:
Robert0905 hit on a bright idea:
No reason to post any more.
No true.
Is the Traxler Variation Unsound?
Sort:
Robert0905 is without reason:
ghostofmaroczy realized what a smart person I am:
Robert0905 hit on a bright idea:
No reason to post any more.
No true.
if black play traxler in bullet, he has better chance of winning.(as he knows the lines and white needs time to remember variations)
Hi i have two things to say i am defintly weaker than a IM.But here is my opinions and i have resereched about the traxler in the past first Bxf7 is not the best its inferior to Nxf7 but white in most positions is over +1.00 i know that dosent mean anything since you are not computers but if you know a couple of lines you can saifly defened.Seconed IM pfren(this is why said i am weaker than a IM) said i wouldn't bother as black with d5 and Na5 but the thing is black has a easy game and more wining chaces than playing 3.Bc5 4.c3(where white will get a dangeroues attack) or 4.d3(you both have the same position but a tempo down) and in the d3 lines the bishop is better at e7.
Edit:This is just my opinion based on my experience if i am wrong dont attack me correct me.
And IM pfren it says in the dvd you sent a black repertoire against the two knigtsl.
http://www.chesstv.eu/niva1/school/Traxler.htm here is evreything you want to know about the traxler
Jan 10, 2015
0
#68
If you're a computer then yes. Doesn't stockfish put white something around +2? But it's so complicated that humans won't find perfect moves.
PPS2 wrote:
http://www.chesstv.eu/niva1/school/Traxler.htm here is evreything you want to know about the traxler
Everything! Except the critical 5.Bf7 and 5.d4 lines, as well the best lines after 5.Nf7 for White.
Jan 10, 2015
0
#70
ghostofmaroczy forgot that this forum is closed:
Robert0905 is without reason:
ghostofmaroczy realized what a smart person I am:
Robert0905 hit on a bright idea:
No reason to post any more.
No true.
please stop jokes & analyse how it could be applied in bullet chess!
Veganomnomnom wrote:
Yes, because one move is proof of anything...the advantage is rather small. How do you improve on Anand's loss to Beliavsky in Linares 1991?
Schussler annoted this game for chessbase: After 14.Rg3 White was much better, and after 20.Rg5 White was even winning.
Jan 12, 2015
0
#75
Tarrasch understood 4. Ng5?! is not very good move, but he didn't know exactly why. Today, we know: black can play 4. ... Bc5! (Traxler).
Polar_Bear wrote:
Tarrasch understood 4. Ng5?! is not very good move, but he didn't know exactly why. Today, we know: black can play 4. ... Bc5! (Traxler).
Except that white is better of course.
Jan 12, 2015
0
#78
In my (not alone) opinion, Traxler is 100% sound.
Yes, white may appear seemingly better, but has to defend accurately to secure a draw.
No reason to post any more.