Is there a secret to this opening, or is it just terrible?

Sort:
Scottrf

Your games aren't exactly evidence of it being bad.

I've won every modern Sicilian I've played as white apart from one draw, I'm pretty sure that's not a bad opening for black.

VanillaKnightPOC

Atm I haven't lost playing either side of the Scandinavian. Clearly it's a forced win for both sides.

Turm_Breuberg

There is not much reason why the queen should be better placed on a5 than on d8. It is certainly better placed on c7 which takes a move in any way. But on a5 it just looks developed while getting pushed around and landing on d8 in most cases several moves later.

It might be slightly better on d6, which made this line popular some years ago.

 

With Qd8 black will usually look for a passive and solid position without any obvious weaknesses or bad pieces but a white space advantage and often a white bishop pair.

Here is a sample from a GM-game:



zborg
VanillaKnightPOC wrote:

@ATM I haven't lost playing either side of the Scandinavian. Clearly it's a forced win for both sides.

Laughing  Clearly true of most mainline openings.

But admitting to it would put a terrible damper on this discussion.

algorab

Qd8 It is called the "Banker" Scandinavian  

D0dle

lol! Qd8 xD thats terrible do Qd6 instead.

AndyClifton
ThrillerFan wrote:
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 (3.Nf3 is also good) Qa5 (3...Qd6 is also fine, 3...Qd8 is passive, but not refuted) 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 Bf5 and now 6.Bd3 is an imbecile's move.

Aha!  So it's 6 Bd3 that's terrible!

blueemu
D0dle wrote:

lol! Qd8 xD thats terrible do Qd6 instead.

It's bad, but not as bad as it looks. The idea is to give up the center and then play against it, with an open d-file and either Bg4 or a King's-side fianchetto... very much in the style of a Gruenfeld or Alekhine's Defense.