Imho U should add numbers of master games, links to the most important ones as well as engine evaluations. 
Is This Useful Web Content?
Sort:
May 15, 2022
0
#2
May 15, 2022
0
#3
Those are all good ideas. Adding in evaluations would be especially straightforward.
May 15, 2022
0
#4
Ian_Rastall wrote:
Those are all good ideas. Adding in evaluations would be especially straightforward.
Cool. 😎
May 15, 2022
0
#5
Ian_Rastall wrote:
Those are all good ideas. Adding in evaluations would be especially straightforward.
U can find numbers and links to master games in the Local Explorer.
https://www.chess.com/explorer
Please pardon the self-promotion, if you would. I'm working on grabbing individual theory tables from the ECO, MCO and NCO, writing them out longhand, and then organizing them in blog posts. To that end, this is what a typical post looks like:
https://chessnerd.net/2022/05/15/eco-d34-1-d4-d5-2-c4-e6-3-nc3-c5-4-cxd5-exd5-5-nf3-nc6-6-g3-nf6-7-bg2-be7/
Or, if you prefer just a screenshot:
Is that useless gobbledygook, or is that something helpful? Just keeping busy, but there's no sense wasting a lot of time on a project that isn't practical. The names of openings would certainly make for better titles, but unfortunately it would create a bunch of posts with the same name.