King's Gambit Accepted?

Sort:
Atomic_Rift
Atomic_Rift wrote:

I studied King's Gambit Accepted for 2 hours yesterday! 

What I found out is that in most variations black has the upper hand!

Atomic_Rift

Here's one variation I remember...

The book said it was even on the last position. Any comments?

eragonfan125

Really?

Atomic_Rift
eragonfan125 wrote:

Really?

Yeah! :o

irnman

The king's gambit accepted appears to lead to open play with equal chances for both black and white.Does this mean that the better rated player should win most of the time with either colour? If so would it be wiser to avoid playing it against stronger opponents if a win was your priority?

Just thinking out loud! Regards 

Atomic_Rift
irnman wrote:

Regards the posted game by atomic rift--

1st. 4.h4 is a mistake. Better h3

2nd. Now Nf3 must move and move again.

3rd. Pawn structure  decimated by move 11.

I have found after much study that the majority of king's gambit accepted  games will favour white with good play.As here bad white play will favour black.

But h4 is book... um...

irnman

If h4 was book move, how did white lose?

Atomic_Rift

But it said it was even at the last position some reason.

JG27Pyth
irnman wrote:

If h4 was book move, how did white lose?

4.h4 is the kieseritzky gambit -- here's a famous example... hopefully you won't complain about the quality of the opposition.



eragonfan125
Atomic_Rift wrote:

Here's one variation I remember...

 

The book said it was even on the last position. Any comments?

White is dumb!



Snackly

I enjoy King's Gambit.  Few people play it and it leads to an open and interesting game.  Especially good in blitz.  Thanks for sharing the Spassky-Fischer game!

davidacrompton

There won't be enough books!  I, unlike some, don't think chess will ever be solved - too many possible moves.

irnman

Is the King's gambit accepted a good opening for black in short blitz games or is it more suited to a longer strategic game?

Atomic_Rift
JG27Pyth wrote:
irnman wrote:

If h4 was book move, how did white lose?

4.h4 is the kieseritzky gambit -- here's a famous example... hopefully you won't complain about the quality of the opposition.

 



I remember studing this game! Spassky beat Fischer with it!

Atomic_Rift
Pen2da_Pixel wrote:
 

I remember one position where it said you sack your knight! I thought it was a crazy idea but there are chances of attack.

Atomic_Rift

People that play the King's Gambit strive for attack. But I think there's better openings to attack with.

Ubik42

After 

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4

the only move for white that does NOT lose by force is 3. Be2

SmyslovFan
Ubik42 wrote:

After 

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4

the only move for white that does NOT lose by force is 3. Be2

That was the subject of an April Fool's story in chessbase. I'm amazed at how many people actually believed it!

Ubik42
SmyslovFan wrote:
Ubik42 wrote:

After 

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4

the only move for white that does NOT lose by force is 3. Be2

That was the subject of an April Fool's story in chessbase. I'm amazed at how many people actually believed it!

Actually, the move that does not lose by force is 3. Bc4

I was just too tired to type it out.

hanab

I dont' think that is good move. You just lose quickly, like I did few years ago. The oponent develop his pieces realy good.