This is basically what Gambits do/ likewise aggressive openings, sometimes they work very well, othertimes they fail miserably.
A lot of things need to be taken into account such as theory and the understanding of the opening and if you have this as well as the experience, perhaps you could get a few good games.
Colle is really nice
I think you should play Colle as white, it's really annoying to play against as black.
The Colle system has its weaknesses though and some GM have analyzed it and picked it apart pieces by piece.
Everything goes downhill when the lightsquared bishop is exchanged as when it is exchanged there are a bunch of light squared weaknesses.
The pawn structure is solid though, and it is a good passive opening that tells your opponent in a way "comeon try and break through me". GM's and other players have definitley broken through before and that is why it is not played on master levels consistently(or as a good choice like the Queens Gambit or Kings pawn opening).
I would play the Colle system in blitz or bullet, but I wouldn't recommend it for a classical or even a "serious" Rapid game, as from what I've seen it either end in draws or losses for white if even the simplest of errors are made. It is not an inferior opening by far, however I wouldn't call it an advantageous opening either.
Those are just my thoughts on this matter.
Colle is really nice
I think you should play Colle as white, it's really annoying to play against as black.
I will give it a go!
To the OP- While both the KID and KIA are both good openings to play, they are different.
The KIA is a pure system that can be played in every single game (if u play the 1. Nf3 move order) while the KID is not. The KID is theoretical and cannot be played on autopilot like the KIA.
Colle is really nice
I think you should play Colle as white, it's really annoying to play against as black.
same with the london- black has a hard time getting a workable edge.
I recommend the Queen's Gambit, Kings Pawn opening, and perhaps the Reti and the English opening to have a solid repirtoire with white.
Colle is fine with me, it is just not prefered that's all.
I recommend the Queen's Gambit, Kings Pawn opening, and perhaps the Reti and the English opening to have a solid repirtoire with white.
key word: "solid"
lol 
same with the london- black has a hard time getting a workable edge.
As does White 
I recommend the Queen's Gambit, Kings Pawn opening, and perhaps the Reti and the English opening to have a solid repirtoire with white.
These are exactly the types of openings I am trying to stay away from at the moment. I want a true system
same with the london- black has a hard time getting a workable edge.
As does White
LOOOOLL
Solid is indeed
lol
I recommend the Queen's Gambit, Kings Pawn opening, and perhaps the Reti and the English opening to have a solid repirtoire with white.
These are exactly the types of openings I am trying to stay away from at the moment. I want a true system
Barcza system.
1. Nf3 / 2. g3 / 3. Bg2 / 4. d3 / 5. 0-0 / 6. Nbd2 / then play for the e4 move.
https://www.chess.com/daily/game/200426908
People regard the KID as an aggressive opening, rightly, but a clever White player can Stop a kingside attack quite easily... with the fianchetto or bf5 pin? Lion played KID for a while, but two variations in particular... the Averbakh and the Samich are a nightmare to play against? Making you switch to a c5, Benoni style game. And both are popular with stronger players. Of course you could copy Karpov and Carlsen and play the Nimzo QID combo...
I recommend the Reti Gambit. It is such a good gambit and it is a real gambit as well.
It is similiar to the lines of the Queens Gambit, however in some lines you lose the pawn for a positional advantage that is very solid in the opening.
Not many people play it, and it is kind of the opposite of a system, however a good opening in mine eye's nevertheless as if you decline it the game is smooth, and if you accept it, your practically give away all of your advantages for the center.
The Reti Gambit can only be played if the game starts 1.Nf3 1.d5, if this is the case you are golden.
If your opponent plays 1.Nf6 or 1.c5 after 1.Nf3 then you can have more of a traditional symmetrical or sicilian game that can lead to dynamic or static game depending on how you want to go about it.
The Reti is another system, however it takes some mastering that's all. Also it is an opening for either symmetrical grinding, underminding and counterattacking the center, or making a big burst of pawn play like in the Reti Gambit.
I think you guys would have a fair good game if you guys played the Reti, perhps give it a shot one day, not neccessarily for a rated game, but perhaps unrated on this site.
I recommend the Queen's Gambit, Kings Pawn opening, and perhaps the Reti and the English opening to have a solid repirtoire with white.
These are exactly the types of openings I am trying to stay away from at the moment. I want a true system
Barcza system.
1. Nf3 / 2. g3 / 3. Bg2 / 4. d3 / 5. 0-0 / 6. Nbd2 / then play for the e4 move.
Isn' this just a King's indian attack (the setup you would use against the French, with the e5 pawn defended by the bishop, blocking the center and denying defending black pieces access to the king's side).
The most aggressive openings include: Kings Gambit(although can be played for the positional advantage of the center), Fried Liver Attack, Danish Gambit, and pretty much a lot of other gambits.
Goal and Objective: Trade material for superior development, perhaps the initiative, and a solid game that transposes into a great or good middlegame that is playable for the initiator(of the gambit) and can be hard for the taker(of the gambit) if they are not prepared or have a understanding of the opening, and even if they are it still can be difficult as such aggressive play is made and it can very difficult to keep hold of.