It looks like this:
New Opening
Sort:
Variants include:
9...Be6 Qh5+ (Normal Variation)
9...Bf5 10. Re1 (Bishop-Knight Pin Variation)
9...Bg4 10. Re1 Be6 (Queen-Bishop Variation Accepted)
9...Bg4 f3 Be6 (Queen-Bishop Variation Declined)
And what do you accomplish by sacrificing all those pieces? 
May 4, 2009
0
#5
Ok, but what about 3. Nxe5 (instead of 3. Bc4)?
This is called the Damiano (2. ... f6) and white will play Qh4+ if 3. ... fxe5. 4. Qh4+ and if 4. ... g6 5.Qxe5 winning the exchange as Rh8 will fall. Otherwise 4. ... Ke7 and still 5. Qxe5 and white are much better placed anyway
Hey its a really new one plus you got a good Q+R mating combo... I'll leave it up 2 u 2 move the queen
May 4, 2009
0
#7
some advice is to stick to the opening analysis already done by all the GM's and masters and study them rather than try and create something new. As if its not already been played/named/studied then its not good enough
the dutt gambit and all variations are probably gonna become one of those openings not played often like vienna game and one of those which makes you lose like halloween gambit... i see everybody elses points, but i also see mine, i am like that
Skeptikill wrote:
some advice is to stick to the opening analysis already done by all the GM's and masters and study them rather than try and create something new. As if its not already been played/named/studied then its not good enough
that is very wrong we should creat new openings new moves then how we will be good players chess is not studying only
and after? what middle of game? i'll never play this openning...
In this variation play 3. Nxd5!!
yugilover wrote:
that is very wrong we should creat new openings new moves then how we will be good players chess is not studying only
First learn to play a little bit better than total beginner level (like don't give away pieces at random), THEN think about creating new things.
swiniaWkosmosie wrote:
In this variation play 3. Nxd5!!
That is old, it is an old fork/scholar's mate
Openings are a little more than simply throwing pieces at pawns and then charging with rooks.
Yes, very funny.
...This is not an opening system, but an emotional eruption, and it is the stupidest thing I've ever seen in chess.
swiniaWkosmosie wrote:
In this variation play 3. Nxd5!!
this
May 23, 2009
0
#18
In the first game that was posted, after 10. Re1+, there isn't any real danger. Black can play 10... Ne7 and there's no positional advantage (maybe a tiny bit for white) and black is up a bishop, a knight, and a pawn. Unless black makes a very stupid mistake, white is going to lose.
Skeptikill wrote:
some advice is to stick to the opening analysis already done by all the GM's and masters and study them rather than try and create something new. As if its not already been played/named/studied then its not good enough
Not true. (Although in this case, a good application.) An excellent example of good opening theory shunned by grandmasters is the Bird's Opening. Black will be able to do no more than reach a drawn position with correct play, and yet very little has been analysed. Anyone could come along and suggest a new, excellent move to add to the theory.
.