i think if you play something like d4 it transposes into kasparov's favorite variation of the nimzo indian, but if white wants to keep it in independent channels I guess just d3 and g3
Nimzo-English Opening??

I play Qc2 in this nimzo opening and get the bishop pair. Its not the best way for black to play since d4 hasnt been played. I know im rated alot less so what the hell do i know, its just that im studying chris seileckis 1c4 course. So QC2 is recommended by an IM not me

Yes, it's known and classified as A17 (ECO) :
https://www.chess.com/openings/English-Opening-Nimzo-English-Opening
Carsten Hansen has a full chapter on Nimzo-English in his book The Full English Opening. It is less played than the Flohr-Mikenas attack (3. e4), but perfectly playable. The most common move is 4. Qc2, but 4. g3 is a viable alternative as is 4. a3. For the more adventurous 4. g4 can also be played, since if 4. ... Nxg4 5. Rg1 wins the pawn back and otherwise White gets a kingside attack started (though with obvious weaknesses regarding king safety).
After 4. Qc2 Hansen gives quite English-like lines (g3, Bg2, queenside expansion) after the bishop-knight trade on c3, but obviously White can transpose to normal Nimzo-Indian whenever finds it suitable by playing d4.

You will still need something to play against 1 c4 and 2 g3 since there isn't a knight on c3. This is a popular way for White to develop.
So I just found out about this opening called the Nimzo-English opening so I was wondering what it is. So I searched up Nimzo-English opening but there is no information on it. So I was wondering if this opening Is underrated or just bad. Also is it for white or black because usually 'opening' means for white and 'defense' for black. By the way here it is: