Same thing every game

Guess we won't be playing much. 

I don't think I understand you. part of the point , ESPACIALLY of blitz and other short time controls- is to play many games and become VEry familiar with the positions that can occur.  so- repeatitive openings are, Actually an opportunity. an opportunity to see similar strategic and tactical patterns.

Neither the colle or stonewall systems are very bold first moves, and black is practically empowered to meet either many different ways. 

If you don't know about some of blacks major replies-- you have studying to do, and you should be glad that often getting a few good ideas

you will quickly have another chance to try some of your ideas out.

Guess you'll have to learn how to be an aggressive player, even vs dull openings. Study tals games

OP needs to deal with anger issues.

Lol you can't avoid playing them.

Dude, quit saying you have good results against these openings. That's obviously false. Look at your rating; I'm sure you get caught by gimmicky openings all the time even in standard. I'm not trying to insult you but clearly you wouldn't be posting this if you were doing well against these people- because then you would be happy to see the same dumb openings over and over.

Get better. Then when someone plays the exact same line you can actually LEARN from your mistakes and not lose to the same thing over and over.

Not everyone plays blitz in order to box with you. I,personally, play to learn an opening system for OTB preparation. Therefore my single line becomes incredibly diverse when playing multiple opponents and I'm well versed for anything I may see come tournament time.

I am neither worthless nor a scumbag, thank you very much.

argue all you want  , the op is just some moron that wants to impose his beleives in others , the main rule in chess is do whatever you want anything else is garbage

Im still stuck on the fact that he plays 30 openings???

Preemptively blocked OP

Awesome, free win if i play a stonewall against you?

Dude, chill out, some people like to play the Colle or the Stonewall. If you don't like playing against them then play c4, e4, f4 to start the game a different way.

OP  : If you do relaxing activities like DO, Karate DO ... and ZEN you may discover that being better is to repeat .

For instance Bruce Lee former master of Valera then Didier Champ's (my teacher 1971-1974) said : if u do a Tsuki let us say 100000 times, just think to do 100001 perfect.

I guess in chess opening it is the same, search of excellency.

But you can play chess960, invented by Fisher, who was skightly efficient in ALL openings, including bad ones, irregular, etc ... I would'nt have won against him even if he choosed h4.

In another way Carlsen says "opening no matter, it is to create something interesting after 10 moves".

The joke : We may know A00 to  Z99 openings, and still have fun playin' only A00, which is my case.  I'm not brilliant and start A01 in Kortchnoi's age, in 20 years. 

Don't wanna embarass myself but could someone explain what a Colle and a Stonewall is?

Thanks for the visual examples GShimmy. Could someone without a bias give a legitamite analysis to the photos with the opening theory behind them and what not please.