Sicilian Business


You can play 2...d5 in the Sicilian, but it won't be much of a Sicilian any more. Looks more like a Scandinavian where you can't put your Q on a5.

err...what do you mean? can you do a diagram for me because its easier to understand
Ok, this is what I mean

Would you like to play a game trying your line out?
It's failing, White still plays d4, and I just take his pawn, but he has good piece play

interesting line...seems like some sort of sicilian gambit after:
of course, this is just me putting ideas out. would love someone to improve this because it looks very interesting!
err...what do you mean? can you do a diagram for me because its easier to understand
Ok, this is what I mean
Umm... after c4 with natural development white is a pawn up for no compensation on the black side, at least as I read the game.

d5 is actually a move played in the sicilian in response to the grand prix attack. It is considered the reason why it is so uncommon. It is called the Tal Gambit.

Yeah, that's where I got the main idea from, I was trying to combine the ideas but there are the main reasons why you would play d5 in that situation, so i understand now

d5 is actually a move played in the sicilian in response to the grand prix attack. It is considered the reason why it is so uncommon. It is called the Tal Gambit.
What happens if White doesn't capture the pawn, he just slides it forward to e5? do you just play like a Caro-Kann game?

What happens if White doesn't capture the pawn, he just slides it forward to e5? do you just play like a Caro-Kann game?
Sorta but the position is quite different in a few ways, black probably has something like equal chances but you would need a strong masters verdict, not mine (yet).
Can someone please help explain to me why Black's second move in the sicilian should not be d5? c5 camps out d4, and white's e pawn is exchanged