The Fried Liver Attack is OP

Sort:
Avatar of 25GSchatz22
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

It'd be called: The Two Knights Defense: Modern, Vexing Variation, Idiot Attack, Dumb Defense

Avatar of assassin3752
25GSchatz22 wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

It'd be called: The Two Knights Defense: Modern, Vexing Variation, Idiot Attack, Dumb Defense

lol

Avatar of assassin3752
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

here's how to refute the fried liver

 

Either this is a joke or your very dumb to not see that it's a mate In 3

its obviously a joke

Avatar of JackRoach
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

here's how to refute the fried liver

 

Either this is a joke or your very dumb to not see that it's a mate In 3

*you're

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

here's how to refute the fried liver

 

Either this is a joke or your very dumb to not see that it's a mate In 3

it's a joke

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
JackRoach wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
asdfghkl123456798 wrote:

here's how to refute the fried liver

 

Either this is a joke or your very dumb to not see that it's a mate In 3

*you're

yep

Avatar of C9_Narwhal
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

oh. then play scandi.

this is the mainline scandinavian, but if u want u could play this relatively uknown line:

 

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

oh. then play scandi.

this is the mainline scandinavian, but if u want u could play this relatively uknown line:

 

Wow. Amazing variation. Basically, all of those moves were forced

Avatar of JackRoach
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

oh. then play AN OPENING ALMOST AS INFERIOR AS THE ALEKHINE DEFENSE.

this is the mainline scandinavian, but if u want u could play this relatively uknown line:

 

Fixed that for you.

Avatar of Cruxter

Play traxler counterattack against it, though white is better, but he only has to play a series of only moves to maintain advantage otherwise white is in big trouble, some of the moves are not even natural for white against traxler, which is very difficult for a normal chess player.

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
icyboyyy wrote:

fried liver is basically a forced loss for black if white knows what they're doing, polerio is considered the "main line."

I'm playing a daily game where I'm playing the Polerio: https://www.chess.com/game/daily/334599993

Avatar of assassin3752
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
C9_Narwhal wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:

People have the used to Fried Liver Attack against me. At first, I though the sacrifice wasn't worth it, but now I realize how powerful it is. Perhaps too powerful? I always have to think about how to prevent my opponent from even attempting to play the Fried Liver Attack. It gives white a huge advantage and I need to be extremely good at defending. Here are the percentages:

Maybe I'll start playing it whenever I can.

this is how to refute the fried liver:

 

That's nonsensical. This is how to refute the fried liver.

 

actually, i just checked a book, here is what it says.

 

That's a long theoretical variation. I don't bother with theory though

oh. then play scandi.

this is the mainline scandinavian, but if u want u could play this relatively uknown line:

 

Wow. Amazing variation. Basically, all of those moves were forced

I call it the The Scandinavian Defense, Rare Sideline, Stupid Attack, idiotic defense, dumb variation

Avatar of C9_Narwhal

 

if u play ruy lopez, make sure to maintain the pin even at the cost of a queen

Avatar of MegaPro-123
25GSchatz22 wrote:
icyboyyy wrote:

fried liver is basically a forced loss for black if white knows what they're doing, polerio is considered the "main line."

I'm playing a daily game where I'm playing the Polerio: https://www.chess.com/game/daily/334599993

no not that polerio

the other one

 

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
C9_Narwhal wrote:

 

if u play ruy lopez, make sure to maintain the pin even at the cost of a queen

pins are underrated tbh

Avatar of 25GSchatz22
MegaPro-123 wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
icyboyyy wrote:

fried liver is basically a forced loss for black if white knows what they're doing, polerio is considered the "main line."

I'm playing a daily game where I'm playing the Polerio: https://www.chess.com/game/daily/334599993

no not that polerio

the other one

 

oh, sry

Avatar of MegaPro-123
25GSchatz22 wrote:
MegaPro-123 wrote:
25GSchatz22 wrote:
icyboyyy wrote:

fried liver is basically a forced loss for black if white knows what they're doing, polerio is considered the "main line."

I'm playing a daily game where I'm playing the Polerio: https://www.chess.com/game/daily/334599993

no not that polerio

the other one

 

oh, sry

well don't be

you didnt do anything wrong you just played the other polerio thing

Avatar of 25GSchatz22

thx happy.png

Avatar of noImAparrot

traxxler counter-attack

Avatar of ZarufIqbal

The Traxler counterattack can destroy the fried liver.