what opening should i play as a 800 beginner?

Sort:
Avatar of OnTheRunFromCubanPolice
PompousOstrich yazdı:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Sicillian is an option at 800 indeed. You are just gonna get Bowdler attack from white anyways. You are likely to get anything but Open Sicillian.

By you I mean OP.

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
Sea_TurtIe wrote:

yes but you shouldint play hope chess

Well of course. But playing the Open Sicilian expecting a mainline Najdorf is the absolute epitome of hope chess. Allow me to lay out what the most common variations of the big four are:

Caro: Advance, 2. f4 Advance, Hillbilly
French: Exchange, Advance, 2. Bc4
Sicilian: Bowdler, Alapin, Closed. 
Open Game: Exchange Philidor, Vienna Gambit, Fried Liver, Giuoco Pianissimo, Wayward Queen Attack.

Seeing anything else quite rare, and seeing viable sidelines or any mainline is EXCEEDINGLY rare, as the sort who play that sort of thing tend to rise through the ranks faster.

Avatar of OnTheRunFromCubanPolice
Ethan_Brollier yazdı:
Sea_TurtIe wrote:

yes but you shouldint play hope chess

Well of course. But playing the Open Sicilian expecting a mainline Najdorf is the absolute epitome of hope chess. Allow me to lay out what the most common variations of the big four are:

Caro: Advance, 2. f4 Advance, Hillbilly
French: Exchange, Advance, 2. Bc4
Sicilian: Bowdler, Alapin, Closed. 
Open Game: Exchange Philidor, Vienna Gambit, Fried Liver, Giuoco Pianissimo, Wayward Queen Attack.

Seeing anything else quite rare, and seeing viable sidelines or any mainline is EXCEEDINGLY rare, as the sort who play that sort of thing tend to rise through the ranks faster.

Did you miss Old Steinitz for the Ruy?

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
PompousOstrich wrote:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Here’s a board of things that are likely to happen at 800, and how to take advantage perhaps.

Avatar of Ethan_Brollier
OnTheRunFromCubanPolice wrote:
Ethan_Brollier yazdı:
Sea_TurtIe wrote:

yes but you shouldint play hope chess

Well of course. But playing the Open Sicilian expecting a mainline Najdorf is the absolute epitome of hope chess. Allow me to lay out what the most common variations of the big four are:

Caro: Advance, 2. f4 Advance, Hillbilly
French: Exchange, Advance, 2. Bc4
Sicilian: Bowdler, Alapin, Closed. 
Open Game: Exchange Philidor, Vienna Gambit, Fried Liver, Giuoco Pianissimo, Wayward Queen Attack.

Seeing anything else quite rare, and seeing viable sidelines or any mainline is EXCEEDINGLY rare, as the sort who play that sort of thing tend to rise through the ranks faster.

Did you miss Old Steinitz for the Ruy?

No I don’t miss it at all. Jokes aside, yeah I forgot about that one for a bit, also Owen’s/English Defense from the French transposition.

Avatar of Geosparos
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
PompousOstrich wrote:
Ethan_Brollier wrote:
PompousOstrich wrote:

The first step is deciding what move to start with: at this level I recommend e4 or d4. In the future Nf3, c4, f4, etc. may be options, but are theoretical openings that often lead to rich, and sharp positions.

E4:

E5: Into e5, play either 2. Nf3 or Nc3. If you choose to play Nf3, you should play the Italian with Bc4 into Nc6, the most common response. If they Nf6 into the Italian, the Fried Liver Attack with it's signature Ng5 can be dangerous. You also need to learn what to do into 2. Nf6 (Petrov's Defense), d6 (Philidor Defense), f6 (Damiano Defense, to which you play Nxe5). You should also know basic theory into trappy lines, such as the Busch-Gass Gambit with 2. Bc5. If you want to play Nc3, you need to study the Vienna Gambit (accepted and declined), and also know what to do if they play symmetrically, or if they play a tricky counter-gambit into it.

C5: Into the Sicilian, play the Closed Sicilian with Nc3 as it is relatively easy to play. If you opt with the open, they likely know the line better than you.

C6: Into the Caro-Kann, play the exchange, and then the Panov Attack with c4.

E6: Into the French, play the exchange and develop pieces soundly and normally. If you play the advanced, you will likely be overwhelmed with attack, and black will know the theory better than you do.

D4:
Positions starting with 1. d4 tend to be positional, whereas 1. e4 openings are more tactical. At this level the only 1. d4 openings you should play are the London System (though it can be boring), or the Colle System (basically a worse London). They can be played into anything. Also, you must study what to do into the Englund Gambit. I have a course into what to play into it (its free on lichess, DM if you want the link. You also need to know what to play into the Benoni with an immediate c4.

E4 (Black):
Into E4 as black, the Caro-Kann is a very solid system, and easy to learn. Just learn what to do into the gambits, the exchange variation, and the advance variations.

D4 (Black):
Into D4, I would recommend the Dutch, but it is far too advanced. Instead, try playing the Modern Defense with g6. If you really like it, you can also play it into e4.

C4 (Black):

You will almost never see it at this level, but if you do, just play e5 and develop your pieces normally.

I really hope this helps! Let me know if you need any specifications or anything else.

- PompousOstrich

So…

Italian, Closed Sicilian, Panov Caro-Kann, and Exchange French as White.

Modern, Caro-Kann, and Reversed Sicilian as Black.

Ignoring the passive, slow nature of this repertoire, as while not my preference, it is a valid choice, and I especially respect the Closed Sicilian, what on Earth is the Reversed Sicilian doing here? That’s one of the most theoretical and sharp openings out there.

I only recommend it into c4, while they will rarely see. I dont see what else is a better option for black. I play the anglo-dutch, but thats even sharper. I dont mean to sound aggressive, but what would you recommend into it?

You don’t sound aggressive, it’s a perfectly treasonable question and I’m glad you asked. I’d just recommend 1… g6 attempting to transpose back into the Modern, if they don’t, just playing Ultra-Symmetrical. It’s a really simple setup and it’s hard for White to generate an attack.

valid response. sometimes its easy to forget that it's an 800. they wouldn't last 5 moves into the reversed Sicilian

Avatar of OnTheRunFromCubanPolice
Ethan_Brollier yazdı:
OnTheRunFromCubanPolice wrote:
Ethan_Brollier yazdı:
Sea_TurtIe wrote:

yes but you shouldint play hope chess

Well of course. But playing the Open Sicilian expecting a mainline Najdorf is the absolute epitome of hope chess. Allow me to lay out what the most common variations of the big four are:

Caro: Advance, 2. f4 Advance, Hillbilly
French: Exchange, Advance, 2. Bc4
Sicilian: Bowdler, Alapin, Closed. 
Open Game: Exchange Philidor, Vienna Gambit, Fried Liver, Giuoco Pianissimo, Wayward Queen Attack.

Seeing anything else quite rare, and seeing viable sidelines or any mainline is EXCEEDINGLY rare, as the sort who play that sort of thing tend to rise through the ranks faster.

Did you miss Old Steinitz for the Ruy?

No I don’t miss it at all. Jokes aside, yeah I forgot about that one for a bit, also Owen’s/English Defense from the French transposition.

🤣🤣🤣 I am so sick of Old Steinitz I just go for Tarrasch trap everytime I see d6 nowadays. It apparently gives up the advantage according to computer but the moves are naturally well so there is no problem playing it. And if they fall for it, the satisfaction I get from it is unmeasurable.

And seriously what the hell is this?

Just why?

Avatar of Geosparos

wow what did I cause lol

Avatar of PlayerIDC

I recommend the Italian Game.

Avatar of VaItroa

Learn the Scotch. It's a good opening that's very easy to learn.

Avatar of SamuelAjedrez95
PompousOstrich wrote:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Why shouldn't the Sicilian be an option? If you want to enjoy the game and learn to play good chess, then it's a perfect option.

Gothamchess says all this bs like "Don't play this, don't play that. You're not good enough." Why should I or anyone else follow his beliefs about what to play? Gothamchess doesn't play the Sicilian. He tells people to play the kind of chess that he likes and wants people to play. He does this by discouraging and intimidating his followers and then they go and parrot his opinion to discourage more people.

If an 800 rated player likes the Sicilian then they should play the Sicilian. Anything can be learned with motivation and effort.

Avatar of PedroG1464
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
PompousOstrich wrote:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Why shouldn't the Sicilian be an option? If you want to enjoy the game and learn to play good chess, then it's a perfect option.

Gothamchess just says all this bs like "Don't play this, don't play that. You're not good enough." Why should I or anyone else follow his beliefs about what to play? Gothamchess doesn't play the Sicilian. He just tells people to play the kind of chess that he likes and wants people to play.

If an 800 rated player likes the Sicilian then they should play the Sicilian. Anything can be learned with motivation and effort.

Agreed. He says the Ruy Lopez is a terrible opening for beginners despite later admitting that he’s never studied it and never plans to.

Avatar of Geosparos
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
PompousOstrich wrote:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Why shouldn't the Sicilian be an option? If you want to enjoy the game and learn to play good chess, then it's a perfect option.

Gothamchess says all this bs like "Don't play this, don't play that. You're not good enough." Why should I or anyone else follow his beliefs about what to play? Gothamchess doesn't play the Sicilian. He tells people to play the kind of chess that he likes and wants people to play. He does this by discouraging and intimidating his followers and then they go and parrot his opinion to discourage more people.

If an 800 rated player likes the Sicilian then they should play the Sicilian. Anything can be learned with motivation and effort.

I want everyone to know that nothing I say is motivated by Gotham at all. I am 1300 and play the Sicilian, even though I "shouldn't", but I would not recommend it to someone else if you get what I mean. Additionally, for example, I dont play the caro-kann, because I just dont like the positions I get from it. But, an 800 might like it and it is viable and solid at every level, which is why I recommend it. Either way, what you are saying is valid, and I think the poster should play whatever they want, and I assume they will take what they want from this post and play it, which is why I listed what I recommend.

Avatar of SamuelAjedrez95

The Ruy Lopez and Sicilian are great and instructive openings. Sure, we can say they are pretty diverse openings with a lot to learn. We can say the Sicilian can be pretty sharp and punishing. However, is that really a reason to bar yourself and others from playing them?

The same difficulty applies to both players so it's ultimately still an even and good game.

Avatar of Sea_TurtIe

i brought this comment back up

Avatar of Geosparos
TheSampson wrote:
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
PompousOstrich wrote:

I see what you mean, and actually you have convinced me to change the repertoire I recommend slightly. I will recommend the French, and to study the advance. However, do you really think the Sicilian is an option at 800? It doesn't make sense. I also prefaced the London by saying it can be boring

Why shouldn't the Sicilian be an option? If you want to enjoy the game and learn to play good chess, then it's a perfect option.

Gothamchess just says all this bs like "Don't play this, don't play that. You're not good enough." Why should I or anyone else follow his beliefs about what to play? Gothamchess doesn't play the Sicilian. He just tells people to play the kind of chess that he likes and wants people to play.

If an 800 rated player likes the Sicilian then they should play the Sicilian. Anything can be learned with motivation and effort.

Agreed. He says the Ruy Lopez is a terrible opening for beginners despite later admitting that he’s never studied it and never plans to.

The main issue with the Ruy Lopez is that it goes beyond theory. The positions that you get from them are very sharp and complex, which is why it doesn't make sense for beginners. It goes beyond just the theory. The Italian, for example, also has a lot of theory, but is more playable, because you can still get through the position much more easily.

Avatar of Sea_TurtIe

PompousOstrich wrote:

The first step is deciding what move to start with: at this level I recommend e4 or d4. In the future Nf3, c4, f4, etc. may be options, but are theoretical openings that often lead to rich, and sharp positions.

E4:

E5: Into e5, play either 2. Nf3 or Nc3. If you choose to play Nf3, you should play the Italian with Bc4 into Nc6, the most common response. If they Nf6 into the Italian, the Fried Liver Attack with it's signature Ng5 can be dangerous. You also need to learn what to do into 2. Nf6 (Petrov's Defense), d6 (Philidor Defense), f6 (Damiano Defense, to which you play Nxe5). You should also know basic theory into trappy lines, such as the Busch-Gass Gambit with 2. Bc5. If you want to play Nc3, you need to study the Vienna Gambit (accepted and declined), and also know what to do if they play symmetrically, or if they play a tricky counter-gambit into it.

C5: Into the Sicilian, play the Closed Sicilian with Nc3 as it is relatively easy to play. If you opt with the open, they likely know the line better than you.

C6: Into the Caro-Kann, play the exchange, and then the Panov Attack with c4.

E6: Into the French, play the exchange and develop pieces soundly and normally. If you play the advanced, you will likely be overwhelmed with attack, and black will know the theory better than you do.

D4:
Positions starting with 1. d4 tend to be positional, whereas 1. e4 openings are more tactical. At this level the only 1. d4 openings you should play are the London System (though it can be boring), or the Colle System (basically a worse London). They can be played into anything. Also, you must study what to do into the Englund Gambit. I have a course into what to play into it (its free on lichess, DM if you want the link. You also need to know what to play into the Benoni with an immediate c4.

E4 (Black):
Into E4 as black, the Caro-Kann is a very solid system, and easy to learn. Just learn what to do into the gambits, the exchange variation, and the advance variations.

D4 (Black):
Into D4, I would recommend the Dutch, but it is far too advanced. Instead, try playing the Modern Defense with g6. If you really like it, you can also play it into e4.

C4 (Black):

You will almost never see it at this level, but if you do, just play e5 and develop your pieces normally.

I really hope this helps! Let me know if you need any specifications or anything else.

- PompousOstrich

Avatar of Geosparos
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:

The Ruy Lopez and Sicilian are great and instructive openings. Sure, we can say they are pretty diverse openings with a lot to learn. We can say the Sicilian can be pretty sharp and punishing. However, is that really a reason to bar yourself and others from playing them?

The same difficulty applies to both players so it's ultimately still an even and good game.

I just dont think it makes sense for a low-rated player to get into complex positions willingly. It makes more sense to learn how to place pieces in good squares and maneuver pieces properly in an easier setting, before trying to get yourself into a very complex position and "winging it".

Avatar of Geosparos
Sea_TurtIe wrote:

PompousOstrich wrote:

The first step is deciding what move to start with: at this level I recommend e4 or d4. In the future Nf3, c4, f4, etc. may be options, but are theoretical openings that often lead to rich, and sharp positions.

E4:

E5: Into e5, play either 2. Nf3 or Nc3. If you choose to play Nf3, you should play the Italian with Bc4 into Nc6, the most common response. If they Nf6 into the Italian, the Fried Liver Attack with it's signature Ng5 can be dangerous. You also need to learn what to do into 2. Nf6 (Petrov's Defense), d6 (Philidor Defense), f6 (Damiano Defense, to which you play Nxe5). You should also know basic theory into trappy lines, such as the Busch-Gass Gambit with 2. Bc5. If you want to play Nc3, you need to study the Vienna Gambit (accepted and declined), and also know what to do if they play symmetrically, or if they play a tricky counter-gambit into it.

C5: Into the Sicilian, play the Closed Sicilian with Nc3 as it is relatively easy to play. If you opt with the open, they likely know the line better than you.

C6: Into the Caro-Kann, play the exchange, and then the Panov Attack with c4.

E6: Into the French, play the exchange and develop pieces soundly and normally. If you play the advanced, you will likely be overwhelmed with attack, and black will know the theory better than you do.

D4:
Positions starting with 1. d4 tend to be positional, whereas 1. e4 openings are more tactical. At this level the only 1. d4 openings you should play are the London System (though it can be boring), or the Colle System (basically a worse London). They can be played into anything. Also, you must study what to do into the Englund Gambit. I have a course into what to play into it (its free on lichess, DM if you want the link. You also need to know what to play into the Benoni with an immediate c4.

E4 (Black):
Into E4 as black, the Caro-Kann is a very solid system, and easy to learn. Just learn what to do into the gambits, the exchange variation, and the advance variations.

D4 (Black):
Into D4, I would recommend the Dutch, but it is far too advanced. Instead, try playing the Modern Defense with g6. If you really like it, you can also play it into e4.

C4 (Black):

You will almost never see it at this level, but if you do, just play e5 and develop your pieces normally.

I really hope this helps! Let me know if you need any specifications or anything else.

- PompousOstrich

?

Avatar of Sea_TurtIe

i brought that comment back up