Which is the best opening?
Sort:
binibeca
Jun 1, 2020
0
#21
I like Berlin
Jun 1, 2020
0
#22
I like to play Sicilian when Black and White plays e4. As White usually play d4.
I play Scotch Four Knights when playing White and Scandinavian or Tarrasch when I'm playing Black. I personally dislike openings like the Sicilian, French Defense, or Caro-Kann, but thats my opinion and everyone probably disagrees with me for it.
Wow, people actually agree with me! But the Sicilian is one of those openings which you either love or absolutely hate. No mildly disliking it.
The best opening is the one that make you want to play chess again.
There are no best openings and it all depends on how you play, otherwise, if you *really* want an answer, you could check stockfish's eval, he prefers some openings to others, however, you should note that also stock-fish has a style of play, engines are not perfect and the proof is that stockfish prefers positional openings
I Personally like the italian game as it leads up to the fried liver attack
Jun 4, 2020
0
#39
PearlBroom wrote:
Its a stupid question because there are many possible answers. >>>>what is your favourite colours ? >>> many answers.
Atheism says "God does not exist" that assertion could be right but to be right you have to prove that God does not exist ...right or false ?
>>>> The same for "best opening".>>>> We only can say "it may be that the openings that Kasparov or Carlsen (who are 2 stronger players) are used to using, are the best ? But not all the time because they didn't win all the time :=! >>>>> The best opening does not exist. To exist an opening has to be a winning opening 100 per cent . >>>> Only God is perfect. >>>> Does God exist ? We all have to work hard to answer this question ....
Atheism has been proven wrong based on the Contingency Argument for the Existence of a God.
It does not prove the Christian god (Jesus) or the Muslim god (Allah) or the Greek gods (Venus, Zeus, etc). It merely proves the existence of a god of some sort. That god could be 6-headed monster, it could be satan, it could be an evil White police officer, it could be a cactus, it could be anything, good, evil, or indifferent. There is no proven physical or spiritual feature about this god. All that is proven is the MERE EXISTENCE OF AT LEAST ONE GOD. There could be many gods. We don't know and anybody who claims they know are full of brown stuff that comes out of your butt.
Therefore, if you are Satanic, you may be right. If you are Muslim, you may be right. If you are Christian, you may be right. Nobody knows as that is not proven. All that is proven is the existence of at least one of some sort which disproves Atheism!
ThrillerFan wrote:
Atheism has been proven wrong based on the Contingency Argument for the Existence of a God.
Atheism is experimentally confirmed daily, at every single second. If God (or anything you want to call this name) actually *appears*, every atheist including myself will change his/her mind.
This has never occurred and wannabe fake formal logic doesn't count (from my experience they botch logical quantifiers , mainly "there exists" and treat it as a property of the object that follow its mention, misunderstanding what bound variables actually are in formal sentences. But whatever, when the real world is involved, experimental confirmation is truly what matters in the establishment of truth).