Chess Player of the Month August 2010

Sort:
-X-
trysts wrote:
RDR75 wrote:

The reason it was controversial is because Doyle had more votes (I think) but some of his supporters went campaigning (in some groups) after proknight said it wasn't allowed.


I thought Doyle lost because crazy CHESS_ASSASSINS' vote got booted in a tie vote, giving Xenia the win?


 Well I pretty much tuned out after awhile because it was too much of a gong show, but I think proknight disregarded not only CHESS_ASSASSINS' vote, but all the votes he deemed a result of CHESS_ASSASSINS' campaigning.

trysts
atudor wrote:

See that's the problem the person that was saying vote for Mike wasn't  even in any of his groups and the 2 of them don't even like each other. So this person Mike didn't even like or talk to posted vote for Mike and he was disqualified. This was the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of.

No ProKnight disqualified like 20 votes so that LisaV could win. It was fixed from the beginning.


Wow! 20 votes? I missed that! I must not have been drunkLaughing But LisaV was a brilliant choice! She gave us comedy, spunk, and it was very naughty to vote for herLaughing I personally didn't know MikeDoyle, but I hadn't even heard of Atudor until that "clueless" kid, proKnight98 spent the time and energy creating a thread to award you "Player of the Month" in July! How grateful and adult-like you've acted since! Hysterical!Laughing

zombywoof

hmm.... commercials paid by special interest groups not endorsed by the candidate.  Definitely an issue that is ripe for debate....  Don't know about its implication in this given instance, but I only became aware of this forum from it being mentioned in one of my groups.... Rule violation?  Sounds like an odd rule though.  What qualifies as campaigning vs voter registration?  How is it monitored?  Are references to the work they have done campaigning?  In this forum?  In group notes?  Seems like a difficult thing to define let alone regulate, but if you could provide the post # which explains everything perhaps I can gain some insight..... thanks

-X-

Well I could, but I would have to go back and dig through it all and I'm not understanding why I should do that. Are you not able?

One sugggestion for you, artfizz might have all the information you seek formulated in a nice easy-to-read table. He does that sort of thing. TBH though, I kind of doubt he is interested in this thread.

electricpawn

It's not a contest sanctioned by chess.com. It doesn't offer a prize like atudor's contest, so it doesn't warrant much regulation - if any. It's all a lot of nothing, so what can it mean?

zombywoof

lol.... sure you are right.... rules and regs buried within the pages of drivel..... so familiar....  Guess I naively thought US legislators had cornered the world market on such techniques!  Well....  Perhaps my country only perfected it?

 

The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.

Frank Zappa

ilikeflags
atudor wrote:

See that's the problem the person that was saying vote for Mike wasn't  even in any of his groups and the 2 of them don't even like each other. So this person Mike didn't even like or talk to posted vote for Mike and he was disqualified. This was the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of.

No ProKnight disqualified like 20 votes so that LisaV could win. It was fixed from the beginning.


i seem to remember your win being overtly fixed from the start as well.  you got 2 votes in the fisrt rounds.  2.  trysts got just as many but was not moved to the second round where you wne t on to get a million votes (after your campaign)  it's awesome that you care so much.  thank you for saving us from ourselves.

ilikeflags
atudor wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
atudor wrote:

@ ivandh  What do you mean have tact ProKnight is like 13 yrs old. Now if that not a kid maybe I'm to old but what do they call 13 yr olds that have just started middle school. Let me know what the proper thing would be for me to call him.


How about sir? 


 Sorry he absolutely does not deserve to be called SIr. Sir first of all does not only imply a male but also a man that deserves respect. There has been nothing this kid has done that desires even the smallest amount of respect. This whole forum has been nothing put contempt and he doesn't even know or care to stop it. So if you don't like kid you need to come up with something better than that. My only other choices could not be used in an open forum. 


how about being human?  dude, you're a gem.

MyCowsCanFly

So...it's the popularity contest we are to take seriously and the one that's not labled a popularity contest is the fun one?

ilikeflags
MyCowsCanFly wrote:

So...it's the popularity contest we are to take seriously and the one that's not labled a popularity contest is the fun one?


how come this irony is so easy for some of [us] to understand?

theoreticalboy
ilikeflags wrote:
MyCowsCanFly wrote:

So...it's the popularity contest we are to take seriously and the one that's not labled a popularity contest is the fun one?


how come this irony is so easy for some of to understand?


We're all incredibly jaded people.

zombywoof

and so loving and respectful to one another I might add........

zombywoof

perhaps changing the subject to politics, religion, ethnicity, and abortion will encourage a less divisive conversation.......

trysts
zombywoof wrote:

and so loving and respectful to one another I might add........


That's kind of strange to be "loving" to virtual peopleLaughing

ilikeflags

don't forget immigration.  we'd be all smiles

ivandh

LOL

Don't forget global warming and healthcare

ilikeflags
trysts wrote:
zombywoof wrote:

and so loving and respectful to one another I might add........


That's kind of strange to be "loving" to virtual people


they're the easiest to love. 

zombywoof

Who you callin' virtual?  I am a real live breathing zombywoof!  although one with many virtues, so maybe i am kind of a vitual dude!

ilikeflags

well i got burned.  here i thought you weren't gonna talk about the past anymore. 

and dude it's YOU'RE not YOURyou+are=you're.

when did i say calling him a kid was wrong?  you said there is nothing about him that desires respect--and i said he's human. 

you're thick.

theoreticalboy

Yeah but he runs an official popularity contest, and what have you ever done?

This forum topic has been locked