Good Chess.com rating
They haven't posted any stats like that. The ratings are probably better than average for your age and may qualify as "good" but you should stay humble since there are 12 year old Grandmasters these days.
More importantly, you have played 1700 games of bullet. Less than 200 of blitz. About 200 rapid. 100 Daily. That breakdown is probably typical for your age. It's fun. If you want to get better, you need to spend more time studying and thinking.
There were several articles a couple of years ago comparing chess.com ratings to USCF and FIDE ratings. If you search, I am sure you will find them.
They haven't posted any stats like that. The ratings are probably better than average for your age and may qualify as "good" but you should stay humble since there are 12 year old Grandmasters these days.
More importantly, you have played 1700 games of bullet. Less than 200 of blitz. About 200 rapid. 100 Daily. That breakdown is probably typical for your age. It's fun. If you want to get better, you need to spend more time studying and thinking.
There were several articles a couple of years ago comparing chess.com ratings to USCF and FIDE ratings. If you search, I am sure you will find them.
I do try to play as much as possible, but I usually play Bullet because I have five minutes to spare.
I am a twelve year old boy and have only just started playing chess about two months ago I’m rated about 1200 but I think I am rated a bit higher I mostly play bots and beat the 2200 Noam bot regularly also I’m about as good as Magnus Carlson age 10. If you want to study and get better you can watch chess lessons but not do the challenges and then you get infinite for free