I actually thought OP was Original Post
Is intelligence directly related towards skill in chess?
Sort:
So what? I like talking is there problems with posting my views or opinions?
zborg wrote:
Indeed, from @Seraphimity's profile page, No Questions Asked.
The elephant and car pic is great..."my balls your face was even better"----THKS u made my day.
Seraphimity wrote:
I actually thought OP was Original Post
Yeah, both I think depending in context, did mean original post in this case it seems. Other post isn't right actually, original post/er.
Seraphimity wrote:
I actually thought OP was Original Post
as in you started this thread making you the OP, the original Poster.. :p
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
So what? I like talking is there problems with posting my views or opinions?
No, I didn't say there was my friend?
Seraphimity wrote:
I actually thought OP was Original Post
i want a crown they look cool.
ludrah wrote:
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
Oh, don't worry, I'm sure she'll still be in good company.
ludrah wrote:
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
ludrah wrote:
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
ludrah wrote:
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
Ok, alright fine then lets do this Lets argue lets dabate and reiterate. shoot
I'd prefer it if you just admit that your claim has been proved wrong.
No im not going to admit to anything that isnt true.
Which is why you are stupid. You refuse to accept proofs. This is like discussing with a religious person. Except, you claim to be intelligent while most religious people do not.
what proof? and im not realigous and as for stupid? really? lol
If your IQ really is 142, I suggest that you reread the thread and do some thinking. I've made it more obvious than should be necessary for someone with 100 IQ. Having established that your believes in a concious theory based universe is of a religious nature and that that won't change, I've decied to go to bed instead of debating. You can continue be stupid by yourself, I prefer to avoid people that doesn't listen to reason.
ok so thats it? you lose? you submit to my ideas and views. I win lol
TheGrobe wrote:
ludrah wrote:
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
Oh, don't worry, I'm sure she'll still be in good company.
? r you trying to support his claims?
TheGrobe wrote:
ludrah wrote:
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
Oh, don't worry, I'm sure she'll still be in good company.
Clearly..
LOL, yeah it's original poster, someone with an IQ of 142 should be able to figure that out. Also, what kind of self-described intelligent person uses yeah buddy that many times? Sounds like a frequent watcher of Jersey Shore
Seraphimity wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
ludrah wrote:
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
Oh, don't worry, I'm sure she'll still be in good company.
Clearly..
whos going to what?
Bobbylow wrote:
LOL, yeah it's original poster, someone with an IQ of 142 should be able to figure that out. Also, what kind of self-described intelligent person uses yeah buddy that many times? Sounds like a frequent watcher of Jersey Shore
Watching Jersey Shore is also not correlated to intelligence, just to having really bad taste.
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
Seraphimity wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
ludrah wrote:
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
You can continue be stupid by yourself...,
Oh, don't worry, I'm sure she'll still be in good company.
Clearly..
whos going to what?
not you sweety.. in my book you won that part arguement hands down.. ;)
theoreticalboy wrote:
Bobbylow wrote:
LOL, yeah it's original poster, someone with an IQ of 142 should be able to figure that out. Also, what kind of self-described intelligent person uses yeah buddy that many times? Sounds like a frequent watcher of Jersey Shore
Watching Jersey Shore is also not correlated to intelligence, just to having really bad taste.
so what I like that saying ya buddy, people say it at my school so its normal to me.
What does the other poster think about all these shenanigans with intelligence?
Scottrf wrote:
Other poster.
Optimus Prime.
Vanessa_Martinez wrote:
sapientdust wrote:
So you're saying that the laws of physics don't imply any kind of upper bound on how good could anybody could become at anything?
Or maybe you mean that nobody could actually want to be better at something than they are capable of being.
Ooook mister smarty pants, If we live in a concious based universe then essentially saying atoms are not real but part of what we think them to be. Wouldn't it be fair to say that we could rethink parts of the atoms in our brain to be more abundant or responsive or even adaptive towards the goals of chess but not towards other functions? NO! If that was so then every one could re-think those atoms and self intrest ,cause and effect create a universre just like-----RIGHT NOW.
Other poster.
and what is other poster?
OP.
no like what is op what are they used for?
Sorting out medical conditions.
so how am I an OP?
Because you're posting.