Theory: IM's are just as good as 2600s

Sort:
chessmaster102

Only thing seperating them being how well they control there emotions, use their time wisely and stay disciplined about their analysis ? Depending on who the IM is and what type of positions they favor/more familier with there able to play those positions just as strong as a super GM (2700+) would !What do you guys think of this theory ?

notmtwain

I was trying to think of a practical example of your theory.

They can undoubtedly handle king versus king as well as a super GM. 

Other than that, I'm not so sure.

Casual_Joe

The only thing separating them is results, and that's really what matters.

SmyslovFan

First of all, it's possible to be both an IM and be +2600.

I love Dzindzi's comment: The difference between an IM and a GM is that no GM wants to become an IM.

SJFG

I think you'd have to ask some GMs and/or IMs.  When I was a 1400 rated player I wouldn't be able to comment on the difference between a 1600 and an 1800.

I do recall the Carlsen said something along the lines that the difference between a 2500 GM and a 2800 GM not being so huge.

Unbeilable

To put it simply, if they were as strong as 2600-2700s, they'd be 2600-2700..

steve_bute

IM's still don't know how to play chess. Most GM's know a little.

When I started winning against experts, and then listening to a lot of foolish talk amongst NM's, that's when I realized no one is actually 'good' at chess ... it's all relative.

trysts

steve_bute: chess godLaughing

2200ismygoal

I'm pretty sure your average IM is not as strong as your average GM

TitanCG

It's a bit scary to see games between 2200s and 2400s in which the former are dropping pawns off of the board. 

steve_bute
trysts wrote:

steve_bute: chess god

Please, it's demi-god. Don't feed my ego, it's already got a weight problem.

SmyslovFan

Once more, with feeling:

There have been IMs who were +2600! The two groups are not mutually exclusive. So yes, an IM can be every bit as strong as a 2600!

chessmaster102

I forgot that there were IMs rated 2600.

heinzie

Anton Demchenko was a 2600+ IM for some time in 2012 before becoming GM in 2013

Igor Kovalenko reached 2581 before he became GM

Right now we have this list:

http://ratings.fide.com/advaction.phtml?idcode=&name=&title=m&other_title=&country=%25&sex=&srating=0&erating=3000&birthday=&radio=rating&line=desc

Unbeilable

@ steve - I somewhat agree with that..I know a lot about chess..not really though if you think about it...Theres more that I dont know, than I know..and I am a NM admitting this...theres so many possibilities, thats why engines are better than humans.

chessmaster102

Why not have chess.com recognize you as a NM to get free diamond membership

VLaurenT
chessmaster102 wrote:

Only thing seperating them being how well they control there emotions, use their time wisely and stay disciplined about their analysis ? Depending on who the IM is and what type of positions they favor/more familier with there able to play those positions just as strong as a super GM (2700+) would !What do you guys think of this theory ?

I understand you mean from a technical point of view, and you explain the difference by other factors (psychology, nerves...). It might be the case in some games or in some positions, but I doubt non-technical factors only could account for a skill difference of 200 points (maybe 50, maybe 100 ?)

chessmaster102
hicetnunc wrote:
chessmaster102 wrote:

Only thing seperating them being how well they control there emotions, use their time wisely and stay disciplined about their analysis ? Depending on who the IM is and what type of positions they favor/more familier with there able to play those positions just as strong as a super GM (2700+) would !What do you guys think of this theory ?

I understand you mean from a technical point of view, and you explain the difference by other factors (psychology, nerves...). It might be the case in some games or in some positions, but I doubt non-technical factors only could account for a skill difference of 200 points (maybe 50, maybe 100 ?)

That makes more since for amatures I think like why a 1600 loses to 1700 even though there both Class B fro experts and the above it might be the diffrence for 50 or it might be completely vice-versa.