fabel,Anand is not in his prime anymore.To add to that,Anand had lots of great chess players in his prime-Kasparov,Karpov and many to count..Just due to this reason,we cannot forget Anand.
Take a look at Magnus Carlsen-he is great now only because he has no tough opponents-Anand,Kasparov,Vassily etc. are fading away due to old age.Magnus beating Anand and Magnus coming second in Linares was when Magnus was young,whereas Anand was already getting old.Also,Anand losing to Magnus has nothing to do with play but only with age-Magnus is young and has the advantage,Anand is old,fading and has the disadvantage.
Not only that,Anand is a great universal player,he can change his playstyle accordingly,also he knows what to do to win.
It is a shame he has gotten older now and is blundering,but that happens to all chess players.
Had a player like Kasparov been born and now in the same age group as Magnus,it would be a heated battle.Magnus just does not have any good opponents as of now.
Also,Anand is an Indian
P.S. English is not my first language so my wording sucks.
Anand-in his peak
When was that, if I may ask? Before Kasparov retired Anand was never near Kasparov and scored 3-16 in classical games against him (15-1 to Kasparov after a couple of early losses in the beginning of the 1990s). Then Carlsen has been the clearly stronger of the two the last 7-8 years. That leaves maybe 2007-08, and even during those years Carlsen was second behind Anand in Linares both times in spite of still being 16-17 and far from top ten.