Mole Chess Game

Sort:
Asparagusic_acids
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

Well, I think I'm overrated by about 100 points because I keep getting paired with lower rated opponents, but I still should have seen that.

Exactly, you just admitted that you where the mole

 

So missing a move makes you a mole now? No; if that were the case, TheGreatAttorney would have been voted off by now.

 

He is 1500 bullet, therefore he should’ve been able to see the tactic if he took more than 5 seconds.

NotGeneralGrant

1500 daily. I'm only 800 bullet.

NotGeneralGrant

Oh, you were talking about TheGreatAttorney.

Asparagusic_acids
NotGeneralGrant wrote:

1500 daily. I'm only 800 bullet.

I was referring to thegreatattorney.

Tja_05

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

My idea was to put on f5 to put pressure on the h6 pawn, also you made an obvious blunder.

If that's the case, why go from h4? Nd4 is much more natural and probably stronger.

NotGeneralGrant

Nh4 also temporarily blocked the rook, which was another disadvantage.

Tja_05

.....Also Bxh6 was completely won.

Asparagusic_acids
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

My idea was to put on f5 to put pressure on the h6 pawn, also you made an obvious blunder.

 

If that's the case, why go from h4? Nd4 is much more natural and probably stronger.

 

I missed nd4☹️

Asparagusic_acids
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

 

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

 

Yes, I agree. It's the small mistakes, not the huge blunders.

 

You cannot determine if I am a mole or not based on one move.

Asparagusic_acids
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

.....Also Bxh6 was completely won.

G6 and white only gains another pawn.

NotGeneralGrant
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

 

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

 

Yes, I agree. It's the small mistakes, not the huge blunders.

 

You cannot determine if I am a mole or not based on one move.

...and your argument against me was also one move.

Asparagusic_acids
NotGeneralGrant wrote:
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

 

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

 

Yes, I agree. It's the small mistakes, not the huge blunders.

 

You cannot determine if I am a mole or not based on one move.

...and your argument against me was also one move.

A inaccuracy vs a blunder.

Tja_05

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

.....Also Bxh6 was completely won.

G6 and white only gains another pawn.

Then Bg7. White mates.

NotGeneralGrant
Asparagusic_acids wrote:

A inaccuracy vs a blunder.

Exactly. Obvious blunders make the mole more obvious. Inaccuracies make it harder to find the mole. Thus, if you're the mole, you make inaccuracies, not blunders.

Asparagusic_acids
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

 

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

.....Also Bxh6 was completely won.

G6 and white only gains another pawn.

 

Then Bg7. White mates.

 

F5 followed by f6

Tja_05

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

NotGeneralGrant wrote:
Asparagusic_acids wrote:
JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

NotGeneralGrant wrote:

 

I think it's Asparagusic acids. Nh4 was a completely pointless move. A commoner might play badly, but they won't play pointlessly, especially in a position like this.

 

Yes, I agree. It's the small mistakes, not the huge blunders.

 

You cannot determine if I am a mole or not based on one move.

...and your argument against me was also one move.

A inaccuracy vs a blunder.

A mistake vs a mistake. Nh4 set him up to fail by following your plan.

Tja_05

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

 

Asparagusic_acids wrote:

 

JustARandomPatzer wrote:

.....Also Bxh6 was completely won.

G6 and white only gains another pawn.

 

Then Bg7. White mates.

 

F5 followed by f6

f5 Bf6 Bxf6 Qh6.

NotGeneralGrant

I'm voting to remove @Asparagusic_acids.

Asparagusic_acids
NotGeneralGrant wrote:

I'm voting to remove @Asparagusic_acids.

Where is your evidence?

NotGeneralGrant

I already said it. Nh4.