Chess on an Infinite Plane (aidanB1 - HorribleTomato)

HorribleTomato, are you moving the hawk on file 4 or file 8?
35.N(7,4)...

H(8,4) l was staring at the knight

(9,3)

You're in check by the Hawk.

So... my move is Hx(5,1)?

lol sorry K(6,1)

it hurts me to do this, but: RESIGN

I hate to be strict here, but I would rather play using the strict rules of "No takebacks". (one was already enforced at post #138)

At post #160, HorribleTomato posted "H(6,4)".

This is ambiguous because both Black hawks can jump there.

@HorribleTomato needs to specify which hawk is being moved, either:
H(8,6)-H(6,4)
or
H(4,4)-H(6,4)

But then at post #162, Tomato moves H(8,6)-(8,4), which is a completelly different move.

@aidanB1, would you like to enforce the "No take-back", or let the game stand (White resigns). Either way is OK with me. But I don't want to let the changed move stand without mentioning it.

Here is my judgement:

TAKEBACKS ARE EVIL, NO TAKEBACKS!

sorry, tomato

H(8 file)--(6,4) to be exact conditional moves if R(4,1) H(7,1)+ if R(2,1) then R(3,8) Drop the guard or suffer the consequences.

G(2,1)

Thank you for showing me what you are threatening from a rook move! I like Hawks better than rooks anyway.

 now face my wrath