Really? Oh gotta put that down. (4,4) as move 1?
Infinite chess openings
Sort:
Oops. Interesting!
No. That's different. 4,4 is indian, 5,4 is alkheine's (sorry for any mispelling)
Thanks for helping ry. I was right about to tell Tomato
Yeet
For the Scandinaviary: Tomato’s analysis on the line 2. (5,4)x(4,5) Qx(4,5) is true. However, this is not necessarily a forced line. White can decline the pawn, with something like 2. (5,5) or 2. N(3,3), or even the adventurous 2. Q(1,4). Although after 2. N(3,3) (4,4) might be good for black.
I think 2. (5,5) is the best line of the Scandinaviary. Although I could be wrong. Other people should also check.
(5,4) (4,5) (5,5)? (3,5) I think this looks pretty good for black.
I think White is OK after 3. (6,4) and a later N(6,3). He can get lots of play on the “Kingside”.
Also, I recommend you put the starting position in the first thread. Right now I’m trying to envision things from vickalan’s board in post 3. 
Well, the queen can go down and make threats.
True true. Let’s see what other people think.
HEY EVERYONE! What do you think of the line 1. (5,4) (4,5) 2. (5,5) ?
1. (5,4) (4,5) 2. (5,5) (3,5) actually
Some people might think something else is better
No, I think white is better in normal chess.
Current theory after the HTP Defense is 2. N(3,3)
Also, I think renaming 1. (4,4) N(6,6) as the Indian is a good idea. Then we can base other openings off of the name “Indian”.
hitthepin wrote:
Also, I think renaming 1. (4,4) N(6,6) as the Indian is a good idea. Then we can base other openings off of the name “Indian”.
Nobody's played it yet to my knowledge...
rychessmaster1 wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
Current theory after the HTP Defense is 2. N(3,3)
What about 2. (5, 5)?
Well 2. N(3,3) is what Dobby played in our game.
You have to play it in a game 1st.