PaulE got banned only very recently then? After Samantha?
Best Top Blogger on Chess.com: PaulEChess or Samantha212?
Sort:
LegoPirateSenior wrote:
It appears to me that the contest for the best blogger can be considered drawn.
Yeah the pressures to be the Top Blogger takes a toll on a person it seem's.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#64
Spectator94 wrote:
PaulE got banned only very recently then? After Samantha?
Yes, 12 hours ago.
Spectator94 wrote:
PaulE got banned only very recently then? After Samantha?
I wonder if he did it on purpose!
I guess we will never know.
So, after all this, who's the best blogger? Is it decided?
Dec 23, 2015
0
#67
Well I guess this is a good time to announce I was thinking about starting a blog!
Spectator94 wrote:
Well I guess this is a good time to announce I was thinking about starting a blog!
Yeah I think you would make great blogs.
My suggestion would be to add pictures if you can lol.
Samantha212
Suman3 wrote:
So, after all this, who's the best blogger? Is it decided?
It was a draw because they both got banned it seems.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#71
X_PLAYER_J_X wrote:
Yeah I think you would make great blogs.
My suggestion would be to add pictures if you can lol.
Sure. I want to focus on World Championship games (pics work well) and the Sicilian Dragon.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#72
What the heck is going on? I'm pretty new here and both their blogs were decent for someone with my limited knowledge. Now both of them are gone. Can anyone recommend any blogs that are similar that I can follow? I think I'll go back to page 3 and check out the blogs recommended by hicetunc and the post following his near the bottom of the page. 
Dec 23, 2015
0
#73
Hmm . . Funny. I still can go see Samanthas postings on chess.com. Her as my friend has disappeared but her remark is still in my notes.
I thought I would copy them all onto my Word program and repost them. There are just so many.
I am using my Kindle fire tablet.
DENVER
Dec 23, 2015
0
#74
david wrote:
I have made PaulEChess's content visible again, as it was also automatically made invisible when his account was disabled for cheating (same as Samantha212).
Banning someone and then using their © content without gaining their consent seems to potentially open chess.com to some legal problems, unless chess.com commisioned and/or paid for the content.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#75
Well I didn't know either of them only been here a month but I said on the other thread that if Samantha cheated then good riddance. Same goes for Paul. It's nice to see this site doing their best to keep things clean.
Dec 23, 2015
0
#76
Not sure I'm reading this correctly, but this section of the TOS seems to indicate that the site has the rights to any content posted by users in the public areas?
Chess.com does not claim ownership of Content you submit or make available for inclusion on the Service. However, with respect to Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Service, you grant Chess.com the following worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, transferable, non-exclusive license, with right of sublicense, to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, transmit, publicly perform and publicly display any Content you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Service and to incorporate such Content into other works in any format or medium now known or later developed.
Bilbo21 wrote:
Never trust anything on the internet - Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln never said that. He tweeted about it multiple times that it was mis-attributed to him when it was actually Grant who said that during one of their meetings.
Rsava wrote:
Bilbo21 wrote:
Never trust anything on the internet - Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln never said that. He tweeted about it multiple times that it was mis-attributed to him when it was actually Grant who said that during one of their meetings.
Yeah, he actually retweeted it, you're correct.
Never trust anything on the internet - Abraham Lincoln
lol