PennsylvanianDude wrote:
Nah blud not insult the GOAT Jayden Daniels.
Good
Only
At
Tidying my house
Can you beat an Alien 👽 at chess
Sort:
Guys i have argued with long_quach before. You just need to report him for spamming and argue till the end and pray chess.com gods will help us.
long_quach wrote:
@StandStarter
Like the aliens, we are starting to not be able to cook for ourselves and relying on Door Dash.
Like the aliens, we invest huge amount of money into fake movies.
What's so large about it?
Tell me the source if you talk about fairness. You can't even back up your claims. Everyone knows how to cook, humanity has always been and developed to cook to survive. If you talk about the 0.0000001% of people who can't cook then don't say people are starting to order from doordash because of aliens. And no you need to summarize your source. No one should search for the source of something idiotic.
aliens are totally overrated, they don’t scare me.
long_quach wrote:
VerifiedChessYarshe wrote:
long_quach wrote:
@StandStarter
Like the aliens, we are starting to not be able to cook for ourselves and relying on Door Dash.
Like the aliens, we invest huge amount of money into fake movies.
What's so large about it?
Tell me the source if you talk about fairness. You can't even back up your claims. Everyone knows how to cook, humanity has always been and developed to cook to survive. If you talk about the 0.0000001% of people who can't cook then don't say people are starting to order from doordash because of aliens. And no you need to summarize your source. No one should search for the source of something idiotic.
Star Trek is fiction.
Even though it is fiction, it is prescient.
It predicted that we will be like the Talosians, who only use their intellect to dream and are reliant on able bodied people to do the work.
I'm actually talking to kindergartners.
Fiction predicts something doesn't mean its accurate. Try again.
"I'm actually talking to kindergartners". 
Kirk, Spock, Scotty, and the rest of the crew said that everyday when dealing with the executives at Paramount. 
Feb 10, 2025
0
#349
for all we know aliens are absolute gods that terraform worlds. we cant assume based off preconceived notions (e.g movies, shows, etc)
Feb 11, 2025
0
#350
long_quach wrote:
OperationalPrudence wrote:
@long_quach What AI engine are you using?
Law.
Can you articulate why you suspect I am using some kind of AI engine?
Pretend this as a courtroom.
Before you accuse someone of something, you have to articulate exactly why you are making that accusation.
If you don't understand law, I have a recommendation for you. It's on my bookshelf. It can be on your bookshelf too.
Everybody's Guide to Law
Melvin M. Belli
ISBN-13 : 978-0151293865
Proof I read it.
My book was distributed by Crown books, which also owned Trak Auto and Rite Aid. They went out of business.
"Books cost too much." - Crown books commercial.
You cannot get my version anymore, except maybe on Ebay.
Sir I have several Civil cases pending against multi billion dollar corporations as a Pro Se inProper Persona litigant, so I need no lectures about n American Jurisprudence, and the reason I asked was the amount of information and the speed at which is was disseminated onto this thread would lend to the credibility to that assertion. alot of what you posted was irrelevant copy and pasted information, you’re definitely NOT doing this from a mobile device like the majority of people here
Feb 11, 2025
0
#352
StandStarter wrote:
for all we know aliens are absolute gods that terraform worlds. we cant assume based off preconceived notions (e.g movies, shows, etc)
This💯
Feb 11, 2025
0
#353
Chess147 wrote:
The over salted fries incident?
Its 2025 and people are still over salting fries 🍟… what a shame
Feb 11, 2025
0
#354
OperationalPrudence wrote:
Scientists want to play aliens at chess, what would be your strategy?
Use the Alien Gambit ofc
Feb 11, 2025
0
#355
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
His answer does not articulate his reason of suspicion.
I mean YOU as in "long_quach" have already answered the question that he asked about you using AI.
I answered his question.
He did not answer my question.
what question are you referring to? you responded to his question of using AI twice...
My question is:
Why does he suspect that I'm using AI to begin with?
I want him to articulate his suspicion.
heres your answer. he answered it previously
As I said;
His answer is not an articulation of his suspicion.
he literally articulated. he was suspicious that you were using AI due to your large response in such a short time frame, there is nothing more to elaborate on
Articulate.
1. What makes my response large?
2. And why is a large response "artificial"?
the amount of information that you give for each individual response is massive in comparison to the point you are trying to make. the amount of info makes it seem artificial as most of it is hollow info.
Absolutely correct Stand!💯
Feb 11, 2025
0
#356
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
long_quach wrote:
StandStarter wrote:
dude you already answered that question... are you forgetful?
His answer does not articulate his reason of suspicion.
I mean YOU as in "long_quach" have already answered the question that he asked about you using AI.
I answered his question.
He did not answer my question.
what question are you referring to? you responded to his question of using AI twice...
My question is:
Why does he suspect that I'm using AI to begin with?
I want him to articulate his suspicion.
heres your answer. he answered it previously
Thank you! And its raised other questions when he doubled back to the question that was already answered, suggesting that he may try and refrain from the same behavior that gives away the fact that he is using it at all. Out of ALL the questions and correspondence from other forum members, that question was the one he wants to readdress…hmmm🤔
Feb 11, 2025
0
#358
Games4life1 wrote:
This forum was a question not a argument
Exactly 👍
Feb 12, 2025
0
#360
StandStarter wrote:
mb for turning it into an argument
You didn’t do that, and I don’t mind a little off topic conjecture, but that quatch guy was an anomaly, To be completely honest I think the guy has some kind of mental health issue but I digress. Thanks for being here StandStarter, you’re awesome 😎!
Nah blud not insult the GOAT Jayden Daniels.