kingofshedinjas wrote:
Wow!
A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!
Team Irony!!!
welcome super talented guy :P
Chess.com Forums: The battleground of trolls and idiots!
Sort:
Im torn between being a troll, or an idiot...I could just keep it simple and go with being a trolling idiot...but then being an idiotic troll has its merits.
May 18, 2016
0
#44
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
Wow!
A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!
Team Irony!!!
welcome super talented guy :P
I'm glad you appreciate my skills
kingofshedinjas wrote:
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
Wow!
A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!
Team Irony!!!
welcome super talented guy :P
I'm glad you appreciate my skills
Get well soon!
kingofshedinjas wrote:
BlargDragon escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
Malicious threads?
As in malicious software?
No, like polyester in a garment that says it's 100% cotton.
That's not a problem
But you could get in trouble if you sold a garment that says it's 100% polyester and ends up to contain cotton.
It can be a problem sometimes. In chemistry lab, we were advised to wear cotton rather than polyester because it's more absorbent and doesn't melt, allowing a much better chance of getting rid of any chemicals or fire before significant injury.
May 18, 2016
0
#47
SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:
and speaking of who's who. I don't remember seeing your post much Ms Beniwal? how can you experience 'Hell' on the forums without posting??
I don't understand that.
That's because I don't troll. By the way, go to my profile and check my forum posts.
lol
no i'm serious. lol
SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:
batgirl wrote:
There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.
I don't think Fox News has had an opinion one way or another about the chess.com forums.
May 18, 2016
0
#50
BlargDragon escribió:
SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:
batgirl wrote:
There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.
I don't think Fox News has had an opinion one way or another about the chess.com forums.
Yet.
SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:
batgirl wrote:
There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.
The same could be said of CNN...
Or as it is known...I chose not to think for myself so i watch Fox, or CNN.
kingofshedinjas wrote:
BlargDragon escribió:
SHWETA_BENIWAL wrote:
batgirl wrote:
There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.
I don't think Fox News has had an opinion one way or another about the chess.com forums.
Yet.
We need to write to Bill O'Reilly. He will certainly observe and learn without bias and opine in a very informed and rational manner, like he always does.
May 18, 2016
0
#56
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
Wow!
A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!
Team Irony!!!
welcome super talented guy :P
I'm glad you appreciate my skills
Get well soon!
I am A_L_I_V_E and W_E_L_L
Anyways, thank you for your intentions
ilikeflags wrote:
lol
kingofshedinjas wrote:
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
SHWETA_BENIWAL escribió:
kingofshedinjas wrote:
Wow!
A troll makes a thread to criticize trolls!
Team Irony!!!
welcome super talented guy :P
I'm glad you appreciate my skills
Get well soon!
I am A_L_I_V_E and W_E_L_L
Anyways, thank you for your intentions
Ico's comment fits on you :
" Alive well and SICK !! "
There are indeed pointless threads, insipid threads, silly threads and even malicious threads, but there are also interesting threads, educational threads and worthwhile threads. To say there are only useless threads is terribly unjust and inaccurate. The nonsense threads do get the most attention, maybe because they are easier. But even in those thread we get clever and thought-provoking comments quite often. Chess.com is a mix of people, a mix of minds and a mix of topics. With the exception of malicious threads, I, personally, wouldn't want it any other way.