Chess.com Violates California Law



blah blah blah - file the class action and then we might think of you as something more than a lame duck internet lawyer. And people complain that Chess.com censors them lol

I see it as my own responsibility to put renewal dates on my calendar in order to cancel subscriptions before they renew. It's hard when the subscriptions are annual because who can remember a year back? I would prefer it if subscriptions canceled rather than renewed. But I think you can call them and say you don't want to renew. The only reason I keep my credit card on my account is that I occasionally like to gift memberships to non-premium members that have good stats. Just unlink your credit card and they won't be able to take your money. They are not going to sue you. They can't sue everybody. You're making some good points but I think personal responsibility for managing your financial affairs has a role to play here. So what if they're breaking the law? It's not like they're robbing banks. Everybody's breaking the law. Do you stop for stop signs? Do you pay your taxes? A lot of people don't. It's none of our business.


I am not a resident of California and that's why I don't think that Chess.com is doing anything wrong.

@Spawney what is your point? How should chess.com change in your opinion? Honestly, I thought I understood at the beginning but now I'm not so sure.

Once the initial period has expired, subscriptions cannot be automatically converted into a fixed-term subscription. They may be converted into permanent subscriptions, provided that they can be cancelled with a one-month notice (at the most), except for daily, weekly and monthly magazines or papers. These can be renewed for three months at the most.
Subscriptions to papers or magazines that have fewer than 12 issues per year may be cancelled with a three-month notice (at the most).
Firms cannot create any obstacles to cancellations. For example, consumers must be able to cancel their subscriptions in exactly the same way as they signed up for them.
Trial subscriptions to papers or magazines must stop after the agreed-upon trial period.
These rules apply to all kinds of subscriptions such as telephones, internet, energy, but also papers and magazines, gyms, and other services. Insurances and memberships of associations do not fall under these rules.


Once the initial period has expired, subscriptions cannot be automatically converted into a fixed-term subscription. They may be converted into permanent subscriptions, provided that they can be cancelled with a one-month notice (at the most), except for daily, weekly and monthly magazines or papers. These can be renewed for three months at the most.
Subscriptions to papers or magazines that have fewer than 12 issues per year may be cancelled with a three-month notice (at the most).
Firms cannot create any obstacles to cancellations. For example, consumers must be able to cancel their subscriptions in exactly the same way as they signed up for them.
Trial subscriptions to papers or magazines must stop after the agreed-upon trial period.
These rules apply to all kinds of subscriptions such as telephones, internet, energy, but also papers and magazines, gyms, and other services. Insurances and memberships of associations do not fall under these rules.
This is technically correct, but there is an element you didn't mention, which was that the companies, after 1 year of subscription, are required to allow cancellation at any point each month afterward. Chess.com does not violate this in anyway, so while you shared interesting information I don't see it helping your point. Also, if you're going to directly quote a website on the internet, it's appropriate to cite it

I'm going to assume you're a resident of California then, since I don't see why you would care otherwise. That makes sense, but I don't think they're in violation of it since they aren't based in California, to my knowledge. Of course there are laws that Chess.com has to abide by, but it's not the companies responsibility to research and change their site for every state, province, and other recognizable governmental organization of a people.
For example, you and I both live in the US, assuming our flags are accurate. However, assuming you live in California, we live in different states. Therefore, we follow different tax, driving, drug, and other laws because our legislation is different. If Chess.com changed their policies for California, they could suddenly be in violation of other provinces laws, which wouldn't you agree is an infinite and unreasonable circle for Chess.com to chase after. Wouldn't you agree?

Also, @Spawney I mean no hard feelings, but I'm curious to hear what you have to say, instead of just seeing a downvote on my comment. You may disagree or may not like what I've said, but my point still stands until you prove otherwise, at which point I'm willing to continue a respectful discussion.

12 year olds are allowed to make accounts. I'm 13, but I joined when I was still 12 (albeit I was two months away from 13 and didn't really use it until about my 13th birthday)
they did this to me too but i dont live in cali... 80+ dollars right out my account you guys got me stressed fr plz bro i cant afford food i need this money back i aint even authorize the purchase in the first place now my bank is overdrawn and im gonna get charges for that plz bro i love chess but id rather b able to eat than know if my move was brilliant or just good.

Chess Dot Com is breaking the law breaking the law.
Isnt everything a cancer causing problem in California?
I heard Proposition 183 will ban air...