Chesskid cheesing

Sort:
SJHales1
Roger436 wrote:
SJHales1 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

every once in a while i go and just crush some 500s for fun and then ragequit when i lose to an engine

 You shouldn't click on 'not so good' people just to get rating points.

Never said he was doing it for rating, he was just doing it for fun.

I know, but still. You don't get any better by playing people who sacrifice their queen on a hourly basis. The way you'll really get better is by playing people around your rating or higher then your ranking.

rock303

Alexandra Botez sacks her queen on a minutely basis lmfao

Rodgy

"The Botez Gambit"

 

An_asparagusic_acid
SJHales1 wrote:
Roger436 wrote:
SJHales1 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

every once in a while i go and just crush some 500s for fun and then ragequit when i lose to an engine

 You shouldn't click on 'not so good' people just to get rating points.

Never said he was doing it for rating, he was just doing it for fun.

I know, but still. You don't get any better by playing people who sacrifice their queen on a hourly basis. The way you'll really get better is by playing people around your rating or higher then your ranking.

I don’t like playing people my rating, because it deflates my ego.

FizzyBand
Roger436 wrote:
SJHales1 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

every once in a while i go and just crush some 500s for fun and then ragequit when i lose to an engine

 You shouldn't click on 'not so good' people just to get rating points.

Never said he was doing it for rating, he was just doing it for fun.

Yeah, that’s what I meant. Chesskid ratings are meaningless pretty much (for me at least) and I mostly play here on Chess.com for serious games.

 

Ninja_Dragon813
FizzyBand wrote:
Roger436 wrote:
SJHales1 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

every once in a while i go and just crush some 500s for fun and then ragequit when i lose to an engine

 You shouldn't click on 'not so good' people just to get rating points.

Never said he was doing it for rating, he was just doing it for fun.

Yeah, that’s what I meant. Chesskid ratings are meaningless pretty much (for me at least) and I mostly play here on Chess.com for serious games.

 

every chess game must be serious if not you will saficrise everything

jjupiter6
1g41-0 wrote:

Who on Earth plays on chess kid lol

Kids maybe?

People who go on websites for kids to beat them need to get some therapy. Clearly their personal life isn't the success they want it to be.

An_asparagusic_acid
Ninja_Rooster wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:
Roger436 wrote:
SJHales1 wrote:
FizzyBand wrote:

every once in a while i go and just crush some 500s for fun and then ragequit when i lose to an engine

 You shouldn't click on 'not so good' people just to get rating points.

Never said he was doing it for rating, he was just doing it for fun.

Yeah, that’s what I meant. Chesskid ratings are meaningless pretty much (for me at least) and I mostly play here on Chess.com for serious games.

 

every chess game must be serious if not you will saficrise everything

Sacrificing doesn't always work, you have to sac at the right time.

TitanChess666
jjupiter6 wrote:
1g41-0 wrote:

Who on Earth plays on chess kid lol

Kids maybe?

People who go on websites for kids to beat them need to get some therapy. Clearly their personal life isn't the success they want it to be.

i use it to blow off steam if i lose to some GMs on here

GM_chess_player

ouch