Yes. (I'm on mobile and can't send diagrams on V2.)
chesster3145 vs TheronG12 correspondence match

Thanks MSC! I'd have advertised this a bit more but I wasn't sure people would be interested in a correspondence match between a couple lowly patzers.

Thanks MSC! I'd have advertised this a bit more but I wasn't sure people would be interested in a correspondence match between a couple lowly patzers.
To be honest, I prefer games between "a couple of lowly patzers", because at least then I can pretend to be smart.

Game 3 finished. I'm not playing well at all so far. On the bright side, this will make MSC feel like Stockfish.

You can play 3. ...e6 in response to 3. e3 and try to transpose to main lines, but against 3. e4 you should take the bull by the horns: 3. ...c5, ...e5, ...Nc6 or ...Nf6 are your choices.

Thanks for the comments. MSC is right I think, up to move 7 I'm OK, I like white a bit better but I've won from here plenty of times. 7... Na5 is the first bad blunder and it went downhill from there.

MSC157 wrote:
TheronG12 wrote:
Thanks MSC! I'd have advertised this a bit more but I wasn't sure people would be interested in a correspondence match between a couple lowly patzers.
To be honest, I prefer games between "a couple of lowly patzers", because at least then I can pretend to be smart.
Yay for the chess inferiority complex!

Some games ongoing. One I'm probably just prolonging an inevitable end, another is a fairly interesting one where I have two rooks to a queen, an extra kingside pawn but doubled queenside pawnns.
Yeah, probably not a good idea.
Are you using V3?