Interesting thread.
Count the threads in that fluff. Race you to a 100.
Except this is planned mediocrity (if it even rises to that level).
i have no doubt this is true. i have written for a few years now that cc is following the template of facebook. quantity is king. member issues? check out our automated system to see where your question fits.
i have a few topics about new 'features' (functions, really) being rolled out and past issues of functionality aren't even addressed.
hell, they even have bots muting members for supposed bad language-when they can't decipher what is "bad" other than carlin's seven words.
(no fluffy bunnies were harmed creating this post)
@batgirl, Help... I can't find the forum you posted titled something like 'don't worry about computer analysis'
Are you talking about: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/i-liked-this-game-the-computer-analysis-didnt ?
No. This was before that. Something about not worrying about the "accuracy rating". Wait... on second thought, it wasn't you. Sorry, my bad.
Serper is a stone cold hater and an ugly bore. His articles are buzzkill Central and wrong to boot. I don't miss silman at all that fish is another one who was wrong all the time and not only that he just cut and pasted from his so-called books Anyone distinguishing between article and blog is overly pedantic. Learning to spot cheaters will serve you better.
Interesting thread.