What group made that "official." And what clout do they have?
It is the official-term of popular distance-chess that became less-so because of the type of person who thought it was clever to cheat using computers.
As this site very against that type of cheating too has lot's of clout & relevance.
So it's not an official term of online chess here, but a popular term of the older distance message based chess. None of which resembles online chess here as a distinguishing facet amongst the other game types that can be played here.
How does cheating factor into the terms usage? Anyone can cheat in live chess just as easily. Less so with one minute chess.
As this site has clout and doesn't use that term, I guess it's not so official.
James: Ahem. Correspondence chess began with the telegraph. Postcards were much later.
I never said or suggested otherwise. BTW, I had a commercioal radiotelegraph license (also radiotelephone and radar)...but I don't predate Marconi (lol)
No, I have no problem with the word "correspondence"...except that it is no longer accurate to describe what is going on, it is mostly archaic (not entirely...just as is Morse code but not entirely).
So, I stand by what I said. I think that as we now have tweets (we have always had twits), skype, facebook, email, etc...those could also be called "correspondence" but most people would have a good laugh...some updating of the terminology is, I think, needed.
Of course, chess is still chess. That word...old as it is...still reflects what it did hundreds of years ago. "Correspondence" does not.
I win.