The remark would be germane because it shows that NOT everyone thinks like you.
did staff delete some old accounts?
Sort:
Jul 11, 2015
0
#63
AlCzervik wrote:
Careful, Abe, you're using logic.
This is what The Bitch does. If you disagree, she blocks you. She then looks at your history and draws her own conclusions from it. She knows she's smart, so any deviation from what she views as a normal cc member will be met with her bile.
You got one right, Albert. Maybe there is hope from you.
I block those who can't keep up, too.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
"No friends on my list. Right. I'm not using the site as a social site. I prefer it that way". Just because you say something, doesn't make it so. 12 million people here, but YOU prefer to have 0 friends Nothing wrong there Dr.
Crawl out of your own head.
I don't have interest in using the site the way you do.
Believe it or not.
I DO believe it, and its sad that you believe you must have 0 friends.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
"As if your threads (and posts) aren't nonesense". ahahahahahaha That's probably the 1st correct thing you said in 5 yrs. I know a couple of my threads we're nonsense. (spoiler alert). They were meant to be
I'll move past the "first correct thing you've said...", but, that's kinda the point. I've made threads strictly for fun. Pure nonsense. Have at it. I've blocked nobody.
Jamie pretends to be the police of the site, and if anyone disagrees with her, they're blocked.
It's easy to make sure your head is swelled when you've created a topic and blocked anyone that may disagree. Then, pick a fight with staff when they don't agree.
The Bitch has made a point to let everyone know her education, yet, she can't understand how an internet site works?
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Except that I've been posting sparsely, though not playing at all, after March.
You should do your homework before spouting nonsense.
No friends on my list. Right. I'm not using the site as a social site. I prefer it that way.
I know this seems improbable to those who have so many 'friends" but I just don't want to use the site like that.
However, you claimed you had "friends" on the site who knew me. Your account was oppened 4 years ago. A few comments and activity when new. A few more comments 5 months ago, consistent with your activity in February. Not much otherwise.
Sockpuppet profile. You seem to be demanding answers from RJC. Why not reveal your other account usernames; past and present?
Old saying, "put up or shut up."
This is not a sockpuppet account, though I have older ones that I've closed. This is the single account I play and post with. I won't say which old ones they were, but I'm still wondering who you think I am.
Am I part of the anti-jamie cabal? That vast conspiracy?
Like I said, I've been essentially agnostic on you, and I didn't join in on the many forum arguments you have been involved in, on either side, because it was pretty boring stuff for me.
This is the most you've ever interested me. Yawn. Not all that pleasant, tbh.
So WHAT'S your REAL point Al ? You've argued with her for what 2 yrs now? You like to pick on women? I only started blocking recently. I don't think she "picked" a fight with staff. If she did, who do you think usually wins those? She exchanges recipes with people in the groups that she's in. What do you do in the groups that your in? You and your friends just aren't nice people. Your arguments with Johnny M are infamous, but everybody sees the pattern. kco chimes in, Wolfbird gangs in, throw in a few insults by Trysts and others. That's what happens everytime you guys come to the forum. I've got a couple of playful threads, but then I've got a couple of serious threads. I've met good, decent, nice people in the groups I'm in. We help each other
(don't tell Eric). You hi-jacked this thread without permission, or an apology but you want us to respect YOU.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
I DO believe it, and its sad that you believe you must have 0 friends.
If you call some online account your friend, does that really make him a friend?
I think real friends are rare. Better to call them acquaintances.
Unless one enjoys fantasy or disappointment.
" I have older ones that I've closed. I won't say which old ones they were, but I'm still wondering who you think I am. Now THAT's funny. That's probably the reason why you have no friends. "older ones" as in many? "who you think I am"? YOUR the one who doesn't know who you are. You've_been_thinkin, 2 sides of Lincoln.
I'm almost willing to pay somebody to admit they were KAM just to see your reaction. I'll start a thread like Sparticus; I'M KAM
and see how many people chime in.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
" I have older ones that I've closed. I won't say which old ones they were, but I'm still wondering who you think I am. Now THAT's funny. That's probably the reason why you have no friends. "older ones" as in many? "who you think I am"? YOUR the one who doesn't know who you are. You've_been_thinkin, 2 sides of Lincoln.
What!?
Is that your substantial retort?
Why would having old accounts be the reason for having no friends listed?
What!?
I don't know who I am?
You're being glib in lieu of making sense.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
So WHAT'S your REAL point Al ? Since you don't get it, I'll spell it out for you. She is simply an attention seeker. You've argued with her for what 2 yrs now? You like to pick on women? I only started blocking recently. I don't think she "picked" a fight with staff. She did. If she did, who do you think usually wins those? She exchanges recipes with people in the groups that she's in. What do you do in the groups that your in? Have fun. You and your friends just aren't nice people. Your arguments with Johnny M are infamous, but everybody sees the pattern. kco chimes in, Wolfbird gangs in, throw in a few insults by Trysts and others. That's what happens everytime you guys come to the forum. I've got a couple of playful threads, but then I've got a couple of serious threads. I've met good, decent, nice people in the groups I'm in. We help each other (don't tell Eric). You hi-jacked this thread without permission, or an apology but you want us to respect YOU.
Get over yourself. I haven't hijacked anything. Just called it as I see it.
Yeah, I've had arguments with musacha many times. Most centered on the fact he's a cheat.
Jul 11, 2015
0
#74
Al hijack ? just look at the comments nos 2 and 3 of this thread, what do you called that ? irrelvent and unhelpful is what I would called it.
Jul 12, 2015
0
#76
Yeah the staff needs to be careful who they mute and kickout. Some of the people here can sound very persuasive, they kick up a storm, and sometimes some people get kicked out for no reason, just to please other members.
Jul 12, 2015
0
#77
tkbunny wrote:
Smoke. Fire. Oil. Marco. Time to call 911 ...
why did you had to do that ? look what you have done by opening the can worms.
To the best of my knowledge, Jamie IS Jamie. I don't know who KAM is, and frankly, don't care. Aren't YOU just speculating with no evidence at all. Get together with all your troll friends from that Society, you know, Czervik, kco, Wolfbird, Babytigrrr, Trysts, and compare notes with all your staff friends and maybe you can present a case to chess.com, or better yet Eric. I'm sure he can't wait to here the scuttlebut.
I'll be over to buy that used car real soon
.
Thanks for the clear answer though. Clarity is worth more than agreement.