Forum's Quality

Sort:
Stevie65

If you want to filter out what you dont like or dont understand, private chat!

An elitist approach is not for the masses. the rules are simple.." Be relevant"..."Be nice".."Be helpful". Whatever dialect,whatever dialog and patronising remarks like "Masters truly contribute" would truly bring the forums to its knees as masters rarely contribute. I take it your a master then?

erikido23
ChessisGood wrote:

Well, a good forum has three principle qualities:

Formatting + Grammar - While this may not be important to some, a good-looking and grammatically correct forum is much more appealing than one filled with slang, trolls, and random pictures. Focus - I posted a forum awhile ago about openings. It now has over 175 posts, most of which are concerning an argument over computer analysis. The forum was trashed by a lack of focus. Accuracy + Knowledge - A large percentage of chess.com members are amateurs who offer "knowledge" that turns out to be false. Only the masters truly contribute to the forums.

Couldn't disagree(did I spell that right?) any more. 

1.Some are more or less educated.  Some come here to " get away from it" and spelling and grammar are hardly what they want to be thinking about.  Some also find pictures and humor (eg fun) a good quality.  Sorry, you take the game so seriously u can't even have fun with it. 

2.  Focus...Maybe, but computer analysis will always be of interest to some.  If it is the arguments that makes you that angry then I hate to see how you get through a day of work or school or(shall I really continue?)


3.  accuracy+knowledge-Efren reyes(probably one of the top 5 pool players of all time) will watch recreational players play to get ideas because they have no boundaries as to what or what is not possible in the game. 

I give advice quite a bit and in some of it there are definitely errors.  But, there are a lot of good ideas and accuracy as well and I am far from a master.  If you confine yourself to masters you are missing out.  While pfren is a better player than myself I feel I can teach more people about the game at times(eg I ask him why something is much better...Because it is is essentially the answer).

 

But, you have the right to your (incorrect :P) opinion.  Thats what makes up a forum.  A bunch of different(wrong) opinions which I of course correct. 

erikido23

enter the person without a sense of humor or the ability to use context.

Stevie65

BQ..why do you say a troll?

bflat

I've been on chess.com for several yrs yet just recently have been looking up forums. Shame on me!! They have been very helpful, not to mention entertaining as well. Although tactics is very important I am beginning to see the importance of sound positional play as well. Thank all of you.

OldHastonian
ChessisGood wrote:

Well, a good forum has three principle qualities:

Formatting + Grammar - While this may not be important to some, a good-looking and grammatically correct forum is much more appealing than one filled with slang, trolls, and random pictures.

How important is it to you?

Stevie65

It is good to see a thread develop/evolve. Even if it has nothing to do with title.Sometimes an unrelated comment is more interesting than the title, esp. if the thread has run its course. I myself have a scary anticipation of starting a title, i've argued with so many they would jump on it like fly's on s**t. 

overclockedapebrain

Maybe they should consider buying some nice quality content

Conquistador
Grousey wrote:
ChessisGood wrote:

Well, a good forum has three principle qualities:

Formatting + Grammar - While this may not be important to some, a good-looking and grammatically correct forum is much more appealing than one filled with slang, trolls, and random pictures.

How important is it to you?

Your name would not happen to be Windows-7_, would it?

zborg

Forums with photos were often quite entertaining, and a great respite from the usual chessnut thinking.

Spammers have their place in the ecosystem.  Their absence is a loss for everyone, unfortunately.

Stevie65

Ye i thought chriss was very funny with his pics. Hes left .com now. Disenchanted by the lack of responsability in control.And users. Were left to our own devices, any problems, we have to sort them out ourselves. Now and then we have to wake them up to see if there still there.

kohai

Not quite true

OldHastonian
Conquistador wrote:
 

Your name would not happen to be Windows-7_, would it?

Don't get that one...Undecided

Stevie65

Just checkin..I knew you were there K.. seen you handin advice out

Stevie65

where were you during the heady days?

Conquistador
Grousey wrote:
Conquistador wrote:
 

Your name would not happen to be Windows-7_, would it?

Don't get that one...

Well that was directed to Chessisgood lol, I was just lazy and quoted the post on the second page.

kohai
stevie65 wrote:

Just checkin..I knew you were there K.. seen you handin advice out

yeah, busy atm so around quite a bit.

VULPES_VULPES
bobyyyy wrote:
kco wrote:

  Have you notice the quality of the forum lately ? To me is declining. No fun nor good discussion going on. So far excellent contribution posters are Estragon, waffllemaster, can you think of anyone else ? For me I'll give the Forum a 3 out of 10. What are your thoughts and how would you rate it ?

I noticed a small minority of posters are too serious and very humor impaired.

Fortunately there are people who are the exact opposite, for example the brilliant Metastable. For example he wrote:

Descriptive notation:
"But soft, what light through yonder file breaks
It is on the back rank, and it is a queen
Arise, fair knight, and kill the envious rook
Who is already pale and sick with grief"
Algebraic notation:
22. Qe8 Nxd8

LOL!

Stevie65

Its good to see staff involved closely.Help at hand. Users will appreciate it, or they should!  

I'de love to see the office dart board!! 

kohai

I'm rarely that far away