@frog well that is you choice and i cant say anything bc you have your opinion and h=i have mine
Getting a title
Sort:
*i have
I know i never said that i ask for what you think
Apr 8, 2023
0
#5
Seem weird to have some title awarded for playing a bunch of games, beyond the achievement. For some people, they probably didn't even need to play that many to get there.
True now you got me thinking also thansk for commenting
Apr 8, 2023
0
#7
FM_Grind_3CHECK wrote:
Is it just me or does anyone else think that when you get to legend league you shuld get like a special type of title lik LM (legend Master) bc it is really hard to get a title anyways so just make it a little easier but like you also have to be like 1000+ elo and in legend league to get the title.
The point of a title is that it should be hard. It’s not a participation award.
Well i kno but you still have to be above 1000 elo and be in Legand league
Apr 8, 2023
0
#9
FM_Grind_3CHECK wrote:
Well i kno but you still have to be above 1000 elo and be in Legand league
That's not a difficult requirement as neither take a serious amount of skill. In fact being in legend league just means you have too much free time.
Apr 8, 2023
0
#10
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Seem weird to have some title awarded for playing a bunch of games, beyond the achievement. For some people, they probably didn't even need to play that many to get there.
What, no participation prizes? You need to be cancelled!
Apr 8, 2023
0
#11
B1ZMARK wrote:
FM_Grind_3CHECK wrote:
Well i kno but you still have to be above 1000 elo and be in Legand league
That's not a difficult requirement as neither take a serious amount of skill. In fact being in legend league just means you have too much free time.
You hurt his feelings now. You need to be cancelled
Apr 8, 2023
0
#12
FM_Grind_3CHECK wrote:
I know i never said that i ask for what you think
Wow. Serious burn. I think...
Apr 8, 2023
0
#14
B1ZMARK wrote:
idilis wrote:
I think...
there isn't a lot of that going on here.
TICCPROW
Apr 8, 2023
0
#15
It does not really show any skill. It just shows how much chess you play. And those acctual masters have to work for it. Anyway why is their just a M title?
Apr 8, 2023
0
#16
Like this guy:
https://www.chess.com/member/samayraina
He is only 1800 and why does he get a M? do i get that at 1800?
Apr 8, 2023
0
#17
RedFastMath wrote:
Like this guy:
https://www.chess.com/member/samayraina
He is only 1800 and why does he get a M? do i get that at 1800?
he got it as a meme or so i heard
Apr 8, 2023
0
#18
RedFastMath wrote:
It does not really show any skill. It just shows how much chess you play. And those acctual masters have to work for it. Anyway why is there just a M title?
fixed it for you =)
Apr 8, 2023
0
#19
RedFastMath wrote:
Like this guy:
https://www.chess.com/member/samayraina
He is only 1800 and why does he get a M? do i get that at 1800?
M isn't a real title but that was given as a joke if some kind. @Coach has it too
FM_Grind_3CHECK wrote:
Is it just me or does anyone else think that when you get to legend league you shuld get like a special type of title lik LM (legend Master) bc it is really hard to get a title anyways so just make it a little easier but like you also have to be like 1000+ elo and in legend league to get the title.
What are you a liberal? It’s not supposed to be easy. Chess takes dedication and discipline to rise to the top level, participation rewards should never exist, for anything. That’s why we have so many weak minded people. The only one that should be awarded in anything is the winner. 2nd place is first loser. When you get second it should push you to strive for better and get first next time.
Is it just me or does anyone else think that when you get to legend league you shuld get like a special type of title lik LM (legend Master) bc it is really hard to get a title anyways so just make it a little easier but like you also have to be like 1000+ elo and in legend league to get the title.