ivandh wrote:
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!
You know the consquences of thread hijacking!
Hello!
Sort:
ivandh wrote:
And yet they complain when I post a funny picture.
If there are complaints about a picture it's probably not that funny.
kohai wrote:
ivandh wrote:
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!
You know the consquences of thread hijacking!
I read ivandh's not as "thread-hijacking but as ironical comments on other posts in this thread.
timbeau wrote:
kohai wrote:
ivandh wrote:
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!
You know the consquences of thread hijacking!
I read ivandh's not as "thread-hijacking but as ironical comments on other posts in this thread.
The thread is not about squirrels.
Gilded_Candlelight wrote:
timbeau wrote:
Gilded_Candlenut : humour really isn't your strong point.
But just in case you genuinely didn't understand my questions...
1 Why do you think there should there be a "statute of limitations"?
2 Why did you use "lol" instead of words?
3 I would genuinely like to know what made you think I was "upset". Maybe
if you used a word more specific than "upset"...?
You know sport, if you hadn't 'blocked' me in such a hysterical fashion we could have this conversation without cluttering-up Atomic_Rifts' topic.
So you are an idiot. Because you could figure out the answers to all of those questions without asking if you were intelligent and cared. I blocked you because I had no idea who you were lol, you were the one who was insulted, in fact you are the one who cares. I dont. I said what I meant to say and I am not interested in playing pseudo-intellectual with you.
To say you had no idea who I was when you blocked me is a bit rich considering you blocked me after criticisizing my first post in this topic.
So come on Candlenut: answer the questions!
BorgQueen wrote:
timbeau wrote:
BorgQueen wrote:
Ah, Tim... haven't changed eh mate?
Ah, BQ ... still enforcing your sense of humour?
Yes... thou shalt accept thy sense of humour or thou wilt find thyself covered in pwnage from on high! lol
So Atomic_Rift , the middle game of continues...
kohai wrote:
timbeau wrote:
kohai wrote:
ivandh wrote:
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!
You know the consquences of thread hijacking!
I read ivandh's not as "thread-hijacking but as ironical comments on other posts in this thread.
The thread is not about squirrels.
I did say 'ironical'....
I didn't 
I know the OP from chesskid.com as I'm staff on there too
Fair enough...
What does OP mean? Sorry, I'm pretty new here... :-/
daMessiCHEESE-5 wrote:
What does OP mean? Sorry, I'm pretty new here... :-/
Original poster.
Thanks, me too, I know CJ/atomic as I am also on chesskid...
daMessiCHEESE-5 wrote:
Thanks, me too, I know CJ/atomic as I am also on chesskid...
Ive played a few games there and found it boring as you cant chat.
daMessiCHEESE-5 wrote:
Thanks, me too, I know CJ/atomic as I am also on chesskid...
Which name on chesskid? Are you in chesskid feedback club?
kohai wrote:
daMessiCHEESE-5 wrote:
Thanks, me too, I know CJ/atomic as I am also on chesskid...
Which name on chesskid? Are you in chesskid feedback club?
Caleb_John and I'm not part of the chesskid feedback club thanks! :)
kohai wrote:
timbeau wrote:
kohai wrote:
ivandh wrote:
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!
You know the consquences of thread hijacking!
I read ivandh's not as "thread-hijacking but as ironical comments on other posts in this thread.
The thread is not about squirrels.
Oh dear!
There's a saying: "Irony is the lowest form of wit."
Yeah, but you gotta' recognize to whom that saying is attributed. Just watch "Family Guy" and you'll quickly realize that sarcasm in nowhere near the lowest form of wit.
Granted, one could make the argument that "Family Guy" and wit are mutually exclusive.
Edit: Wilde said sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.
Squirrels, people! Let's stay focussed here!